I’m the founder and CEO of PranzoTech Solutions, LLC. We’re a Baltimore-based digital consultancy focused on helping small businesses, nonprofits, and municipal departments modernize their systems. My role is hands-on. I handle technical oversight, client intake, systems architecture, and strategic partnerships. I’m also involved in community programs and pilot projects related to smart infrastructure and digital equity.
We operate lean with a hybrid model. Core architecture, consulting, and stakeholder communication are handled in-house. For specialized builds—like advanced IoT integrations or frontend UI design—we collaborate with vetted freelancers or small firms. All external work goes through internal review before delivery. We avoid unnecessary overhead.
We don’t sell tech for tech’s sake. We focus on local-fit solutions—automations, dashboards, and tools that directly solve operational problems. Many firms start with features. We start with constraints. Our edge is clarity, not scale. That appeals to under-resourced organizations who can’t afford to fail on implementation.
We mostly serve nonprofits, small- to mid-sized businesses, and city departments. Over time, our public-sector work has grown—especially in smart infrastructure and civic data tools. We’re also seeing more interest from minority-owned businesses needing affordable digital upgrades.
Automation of recurring workflows, real-time dashboards, and basic cybersecurity systems. Lately, demand for smart city integration and community-wide data literacy tools has increased. Simplicity and stability are key.
I observe user behavior before I read trend reports. I also follow field-level feedback from librarians, social workers, and community technologists. Trends are clearer when you stay close to ground-level operations. For tech specifics, I scan changelogs and developer notes more than headlines.
Yes—roughly 60% of our work comes from repeat engagements or referrals. Clients trust consistency. We document clearly, deliver working solutions, and follow up without being asked. We also build tools that staff can own and run without us long-term. That builds trust.
We conduct simple post-project reviews—15-minute calls or shared feedback forms. We track turnaround time, error rates, and unplanned support requests. Fewer support tickets usually means the design was solid. We also follow up 90 days post-deployment on most critical builds.
We offer lightweight support packages—monthly check-ins, bug fixes, and usage monitoring. For smaller orgs, we provide basic training and leave behind clear documentation. Everything is designed for handoff, not dependency.
For scoped projects, we use fixed pricing with milestone-based delivery. For advisory or audit work, we bill hourly. We avoid time-and-materials unless it’s an open-ended partnership. Every proposal includes a decision-making guide so clients understand the trade-offs of scope, budget, and delivery time.
Projects typically range from $4,000 to $35,000. We start by clarifying must-haves vs. nice-to-haves. We work backward from impact and resources. For low-budget orgs, we may reuse existing frameworks or recommend open-source tools to keep costs down.
Yes. If the project lacks clarity or the budget can’t support basic quality standards, we refer it elsewhere. Minimum engagement is $2,500 unless it’s a strategic partnership or nonprofit grant collaboration.
The shift to remote collaboration in 2020 exposed weak systems for many clients. We had to deliver fast, stable tools under pressure. We overcame that by narrowing our service menu and simplifying builds. That led to stronger results and client clarity.
We run internal experiments quarterly. One team member brings a new tool or idea, we build a demo, and we evaluate it against real client scenarios. We also attend community tech forums—not just conferences.
Culture is utility-driven. We value transparency, clarity, and responsiveness. Our processes are lightweight but disciplined—regular debriefs, shared checklists, and quiet focus. We hire for low-ego problem solvers, not titles.
In 5–10 years, I want PranzoTech to lead community-driven smart tech efforts across mid-sized U.S. cities. That means training locals to run their own systems, not just building tools for them. We’re also exploring modular civic tools that can be deployed city to city.
Early on, I focused on control and detail. Over time, I shifted to clarity and trust. If the team knows the mission and has clean systems, micromanaging isn’t needed. My style is shaped by working with nonprofits—tight constraints force smart delegation.
I’m watching edge AI for civic applications—small, context-aware models that can run locally to support city operations. Also: community-owned data platforms. The shift toward local tech autonomy is overdue.
Don’t chase scale. Chase usefulness. A clean, functional tool that saves 10 hours a week for a team of five has more value than most flashy pitch decks. Build what’s needed. Make it last. And document everything.