How to remove a Glassdoor review in 2026: what the Community Guidelines actually prohibit, how employer flagging works after the Indeed merger, the legal route to unmask a reviewer, and what to do when the review stays.
Glassdoor removes a review only when it breaks its Community Guidelines. It does not remove reviews for being negative, unfair or one-sided, it will not take an employer’s word that a review is false, and it will not accept money to take one down.
That is the position Glassdoor has held since 2008, and it survived the site’s legal merger into Indeed on 1 July 2026 intact. What has changed is the machinery around it: employers now log in through Indeed, the Employer Center shows Glassdoor and Indeed reviews side by side, and the flagging process runs through a moderation queue that decides most cases on how the flag is framed rather than on how bad the review is. So the work is in knowing which of the guideline categories the review actually falls into, filing a flag that names it, and having a plan for the far more common case where the review is a real employee’s honest opinion and it is staying.
This guide covers how Glassdoor reviews are moderated, what the guidelines prohibit and what they do not, how to flag from the employer side and what to expect back, the subpoena route that can unmask a reviewer and when it is worth it, the FTC rules that now govern how employers ask for reviews, how to delete a Glassdoor review you wrote yourself, where Indeed’s rules differ, and the removal services that are selling you the flag button.
Glassdoor has been owned by Recruit Holdings, Indeed’s parent, since 2018. In November 2025 new Glassdoor users were required to sign in with an Indeed account, existing users had until 20 April 2026 to link theirs, and on 1 July 2026 Glassdoor legally merged into Indeed, Inc. The glassdoor.com brand and site continue, but employers now operate under Indeed’s terms and privacy policy, and the Employer Center consolidates Glassdoor and Indeed reviews in a single dashboard. For removal purposes the practical points are these.
Every review is moderated before it appears. Glassdoor runs each submission through its own screening technology and then, for anything flagged, a human moderator. The site’s Trust and Safety team says it assesses every employee review before publication, which is why a review that is live has already passed a first check, and why a flag has to say something the first check could not have known.
Reviews are anonymous, and Glassdoor litigates to keep them that way. It says it objects to and resists subpoenas seeking reviewer identities, appears in court to oppose them, and almost always prevails. A March 2024 episode in which users found their real names added to profiles without consent caused a backlash, and the post-merger privacy policy states that anonymous reviews remain anonymous. Employers should assume they will never learn who wrote a review outside a court process.
Reviews are limited to one per employer, per year, per review type, from anyone who has worked there within the last five years, including interns and contractors. Glassdoor describes itself as a neutral forum: it does not investigate or fact-check statements, does not take sides in disputes about what happened, and, in its own words, politely declines to accept evidence from parties with a vested interest in removal, which means the employer. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act means it is not liable for what reviewers write and cannot be sued into removing it.
Indeed reviews are a separate stream. They appear on Indeed’s company pages, with their own flagging process, and in the back end of the Employer Center. Combined ratings and review counts now sit alongside each other, so an employer with a Glassdoor problem should check whether the same reviewer, or the same text, is also on Indeed, because a review removed from one site does not come down from the other.
The Community Guidelines are the whole test. A flag that maps a review to one of the left-hand rows below has a real chance; a flag that is really one of the right-hand rows will be declined, usually by the automated first pass.
| Glassdoor will remove | Glassdoor will not remove |
|---|---|
| A review that names or identifies a specific employee below executive leadership | A review that criticises the CEO or named executives by name |
| A review from someone who was never an employee, intern or contractor, or whose employment is more than five years old | A review from a former employee who was fired, quit angry, or lost a dispute with the company |
| A second or third review of the same employer from the same person in the same year | Several negative reviews from different people in the same week, if they are distinct accounts |
| Confidential company information: source code, customer lists, financials, unreleased products | Salary figures, culture complaints, management criticism, or describing internal decisions in general terms |
| Profanity, threats, harassment, or discriminatory language | Harsh, sarcastic, or unfair language that stays clean |
| A review that is objectively false against a reliable independent source, such as a court record or published news | A review the employer says is false, on the employer’s evidence alone |
| Coordinated or fraudulent posting, including AI-generated and paid reviews | A review that is generic and lukewarm but appears to be from a real employee |
| Contact details, self-identifying information, or quotes copied from other sources | A review of a competitor that is more positive than yours |
Two rows are worth dwelling on. The executive exception is the one that catches most employers out: an employee may name and criticise the founder, the CEO, or the senior leadership team, and Glassdoor will let it stand, because it treats senior leaders as public-facing. A review that names a line manager, a recruiter, or a colleague is a different matter and comes down reliably. And the “objectively false” row is far narrower than it sounds. Glassdoor will act where a review says the company went bankrupt and public records show it did not; it will not act where a review says a manager screamed at people and HR’s file says otherwise, because HR’s file is exactly the vested-interest evidence it refuses to weigh.
Screenshot the review with the date, the job title and location it claims, the star ratings, and the URL. Then do the work that decides the outcome.
Read the review for identifiable people. Any name, nickname, unique job title or description that points to one person below the executive tier is a violation on its face and is the fastest route to removal or, more often, to the reviewer being asked to edit the name out. Read it for confidential information: specific revenue, client names, unreleased product details or internal document contents. Read it for language: a single slur or threat takes the whole review down. Check its claimed dates and role against your HR records, without expecting Glassdoor to accept those records, because a review that describes a role, a location or a period that never existed at your company is a non-employee flag, and Glassdoor can check some of that itself. Check the timing: three near-identical reviews posted within an hour of each other, or a review that reads like it was drafted by a model, are pattern flags, and Glassdoor’s screening is built to find those once pointed at them.
If none of that applies, and the review is a real employee saying that management is poor, pay is low and the culture is toxic, you do not have a removal case. Skip to the response section, and read the part about what not to do.
Claim your company profile if you have not, which is free and now done with an Indeed login. In the Employer Center, open the Reviews section, find the review, and use the flag option on it. Anyone with a Glassdoor account can also flag from the public review page using the flag icon, which is useful when a review needs to be reported by an individual rather than the company account.
The flag form asks for a reason. Choose the guideline category that matches the violation you identified, not the one that feels most true. “This review is false” is the category most employers choose and the one most likely to be declined without a human reading it, because Glassdoor’s stated position is that it does not adjudicate falsity on an employer’s word. “Identifies a non-executive employee”, “contains confidential information”, “posted by someone who never worked here”, “multiple reviews from the same person” and “harassing or discriminatory language” are categories the moderation team can actually verify, and framing the flag under one of them is most of the skill.
Keep the explanation to a few sentences, quote the offending words, and say which rule they break. Do not attach an essay about the reviewer’s performance, do not speculate about who wrote it, and do not send internal documents. None of it will be read as evidence, and a flag that reads as an employer trying to silence a critic is a flag that gets declined.
Glassdoor says it replies to flags within 72 business hours. The review stays live while the flag is assessed; Glassdoor does not hide content on the strength of a report, which is a deliberate difference from platforms such as Avvo. A flagged review always reaches a human moderator once it clears the automated first pass, and the outcomes are three.
| Outcome | What it means |
|---|---|
| Removed | The review broke a guideline and is gone from the profile and from the rating |
| Returned to the reviewer for editing | The review is a real employee’s, but a name, a detail or a passage broke a rule; the reviewer is asked to fix it, and the edited version reappears |
| Declined | The review does not break a guideline as far as Glassdoor can determine; it stays |
A declined flag can be resubmitted under a different, better-founded category, but repeated flags on the same review under the same reasoning will be dismissed, and an employer that flags every negative review it receives will find the Employer Center relationship cooling. Glassdoor tracks flagging behaviour, and its position is that employers cannot pay for removal and cannot argue their way to it either.
Note that removing a Glassdoor review does nothing to a matching Indeed review. If the same text is on both, flag it on Indeed separately through the Indeed company page.
Every employer can respond publicly to any review from the Employer Center, free, and a considered response is the most reliable improvement available for a review that is not coming down. Job seekers read responses; Glassdoor’s own research has long found that a majority of candidates read at least four reviews before forming a view and that a visible employer response changes it.
The response should be written for the next candidate, not the reviewer. Thank them, acknowledge the substance without agreeing to specifics you dispute, say what the company has done or is doing about the issue, and invite them to contact a named person or address. Keep it under 150 words. Do not identify the reviewer, do not reference their performance, their exit, or anything that would only be known to their employer, and do not argue. A response that says “we know who you are” or explains why the person was let go is the response that turns one bad review into a story, and it can be a privacy or employment-law problem in its own right.
The one genuinely damaging thing employers do at this stage is to go after the reviewer internally. Investigating current staff to find the author, or threatening a former employee over a review, has produced retaliation claims, National Labor Relations Board complaints where the review concerns working conditions, and, since 2024, exposure under the FTC’s review rule for suppression by intimidation. It also tends to generate more reviews.
A declined flag on a review from a real employee leaves an employer with four routes, and the honest ranking puts the cheap ones first.
The first is volume. Glassdoor ratings are an average, and a company with fifteen reviews is one bad review away from a visible drop, where a company with two hundred is not. Inviting current employees to review, evenly and without pressure, is permitted and is what most large employers do continuously. What is not permitted is covered in the FTC section below.
The second is to fix the thing the review is about. It sounds glib, but a run of reviews on the same theme is a data point, and a response that says the problem was addressed, followed by later reviews that confirm it, is the only way the older reviews stop mattering.
The third is defamation. Glassdoor cannot be sued for the review, but the author can, if the review contains a provably false statement of fact rather than opinion, if the statement caused measurable harm, and if the author can be identified. That last step is the hard one and is the subject of the next section. Anti-SLAPP statutes in more than thirty states, and California’s in particular, mean that a weak defamation suit over a review ends with the employer paying the reviewer’s legal fees.
The fourth is suppression, which leaves the review where it is and works on what a candidate sees when they search the company name: the careers page, LinkedIn, Indeed’s company page, press, and the other review platforms. For a company whose Glassdoor page is the second result for its name, that is the project that actually changes hiring outcomes, and it is a three-to-six-month one.
The route to a reviewer’s identity is a lawsuit against a John Doe defendant, a subpoena to Glassdoor, and a fight over the subpoena in court. Glassdoor’s public position is that it opposes these and almost always wins, and for most reviews it does. The case employers cite is the exception. In July 2022 a federal magistrate judge in the Northern District of California ordered Glassdoor to disclose the identities of reviewers who had described the toy company Zuru as a “burnout factory” with a “toxic” culture and “incompetent” leaders, in support of a defamation action Zuru had filed in New Zealand. The court held that where the statements were allegedly false, the reviewers’ right to anonymity could give way to the company’s need to identify them to pursue its claim.
What made Zuru work is instructive. The reviews were framed as statements of fact, the company had a pending action in a jurisdiction with a lower bar for defamation, and the application was narrow. An American employer with a generic “management is terrible” review, filing in a state with a strong anti-SLAPP law, is in a different position and is likely to lose the motion, pay the reviewer’s costs, and see the whole episode reported. The unmasking route is real, it is low-to-mid five figures before the defamation case itself begins, and it is for a review that makes a specific, false, damaging factual claim, not for a review that hurts.
The FTC’s Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule has been in force since 21 October 2024, and although it was written with consumer reviews in mind, its provisions on fake reviews, on buying or selling them, on paying for reviews conditioned on their sentiment, on insider reviews without disclosure, and on suppressing reviews through groundless legal threats or intimidation apply to employer review sites too. Civil penalties run past $50,000 per violation. Glassdoor’s own guidelines separately prohibit incentivised reviews, coordinated campaigns and content produced by automated tools.
The employer-side consequences are specific. A manager who tells the team to go and leave five-star reviews, an HR function that asks only the employees it knows are happy, an onboarding step that requires a review, or a bonus tied to one, are each a guideline violation on Glassdoor and, depending on how they are done, a federal one. If a competitor’s page fills up with obviously fabricated praise, that is now something to report rather than something to match. And a lawyer’s letter to a former employee threatening a suit the company does not intend to file is itself a violation on the employer’s side. Flag through Glassdoor, sue if the claim is real, and leave the threats out.
Roughly half the people searching for how to delete a Glassdoor review are reviewers, not employers, and for them the answer is short. A reviewer can edit or delete their own review at any time. Sign in to Glassdoor, which now means signing in with your Indeed account, open your profile and go to Contributions, find the review, and choose edit or delete. Deletion is immediate, it removes the review from the employer’s rating, and the employer is not told who did it. Edits go back through the same moderation as a new review, so a revised version can take a short while to reappear.
Two cautions. Glassdoor’s one-review-per-employer-per-year rule is counted against the reviewer, and deleting a review does not obviously reset that clock, so if what you want is to correct a detail or soften a passage, edit rather than delete and rewrite. And if an employer or former employer is pressuring you to take a review down, that pressure is the thing to take note of: Glassdoor’s guidelines prohibit it, the National Labor Relations Act protects employees discussing working conditions, and the FTC’s review rule treats intimidation aimed at removing an honest review as suppression. You can decline, and you can report the approach to Glassdoor through the same help centre the employer would use.
For employers, this is also the only clean route to the removal of a real employee’s negative review: resolve whatever it describes, and let the person decide. Asking a former employee to delete a review is permitted where it is a request and not a condition; tying it to a reference, a severance payment, a settlement or anything else of value is the inducement both Glassdoor and the FTC prohibit, and it is the kind of thing that surfaces later in exactly the forum you were trying to clean up.
Because the Employer Center now shows both review streams together, employers routinely assume one flag covers both. It does not, and the two sites do not apply the same rules. The differences that matter for a removal decision are these.
| Question | Glassdoor | Indeed |
|---|---|---|
| Where to flag | Employer Center, Reviews section, or the flag icon on the public review page | Indeed company page, report option on the review, or the Employer Center’s Indeed tab |
| Naming people | Executives may be named and criticised; employees below that level may not | No individual may be named at any level, executives included |
| Who may review | Current and former employees, interns and contractors within the last five years, one per year per review type | Current and former employees; interview experiences are a separate category |
| Employer’s word on falsity | Not accepted; only reliable independent sources count | Not accepted either, but allegations of illegal activity are removable on their face |
| Response window | 72 business hours, review stays live throughout | No published window; review stays live throughout |
| Effect of removal on the other site | None | None |
The practical consequence is that a review naming the CEO is a lost cause on Glassdoor and a routine flag on Indeed, and a review alleging that the company broke the law is a hard “objectively false” case on Glassdoor and a guideline flag on Indeed. When the same reviewer has posted on both, flag each under the rule that site actually enforces, not the one you used on the other.
Search for Glassdoor review removal and the first page is services promising guaranteed deletion, usually “pay only on results”. Their tool is the flag form described above. Their skill, where they have one, is in choosing the category; their business model is that most employers choose the wrong one.
| The pitch | What it really means |
|---|---|
| “Guaranteed Glassdoor review removal” | Nobody outside Glassdoor can guarantee this. Glassdoor will not accept payment or vested-interest evidence from anyone |
| “We have contacts at Glassdoor” | Glassdoor’s moderation team applies the same guidelines to everyone, and its clients are contractually barred from paying for removal |
| “Removal in 48 hours” | Glassdoor’s own response window is 72 business hours, and nothing is hidden in the meantime |
| “Pay only on success” at a low flat fee | Success will be defined loosely, or the firm will take on only the reviews that were always going to come down |
| “We will identify the reviewer” | Only a court can do that, and Glassdoor fights it. Anything else is guesswork about your own staff |
| “We will remove it from Google” | Google does not de-index a Glassdoor review without a court order or a narrow policy ground. What is on offer is suppression |
A legitimate firm will tell you which guideline it intends to rely on, whether it thinks the flag will succeed, what it will do if the flag fails, and what that costs. If the answer to every question is “removal”, keep your money.
A single review that names a junior employee is a ten-minute flag. A coordinated campaign, a defamation claim with a subpoena fight, an Indeed and Glassdoor problem at once, or a search results page that needs rebuilding around a review that is not coming down is a different job. The firms that handle this every week are in ReVerb’s lists of the leading reputation management firms in 2026 and the top reputation management companies for content removal and suppression in 2026. Ask each one the four questions above, and ask how they would handle the employee-relations side, because a removal that current staff notice is a removal that generates the next review.
Only if it breaks Glassdoor’s Community Guidelines: it identifies a non-executive employee, contains confidential information, profanity or discriminatory language, comes from someone who never worked there or whose employment is more than five years old, is a duplicate from the same person, is objectively false against an independent source, or is part of a fake or coordinated campaign. A negative review from a real employee will not be removed.
Claim your profile, sign in through Indeed, open Reviews in the Employer Center, and use the flag option on the review. Choose the guideline category that matches the violation, quote the offending words, and keep it short. Anyone can also flag from the public review page.
Glassdoor says it replies within 72 business hours. The review stays live while the flag is assessed.
No. Unlike some platforms, Glassdoor leaves flagged content up until a moderator decides.
No. Glassdoor states that employers cannot pay to have reviews removed, and its paying clients are contractually bound by that.
Not from Glassdoor. It resists subpoenas and says it almost always wins. A court ordered disclosure in the 2022 Zuru case, but only on a narrow application tied to a defamation suit over specific factual claims.
No. Glassdoor merged into Indeed on 1 July 2026 and now runs under Indeed’s terms, but the Community Guidelines, the moderation process and the anonymity commitment continue. Employers sign in through Indeed and see both sites’ reviews in one dashboard.
Yes. Glassdoor allows reviewers to name and criticise executive leadership. It does not allow them to name employees below that level.
Yes, evenly and without incentive or pressure. Requiring reviews, paying for them, selecting only happy employees, or tying reviews to bonuses breaks Glassdoor’s guidelines and can breach the FTC’s review rule.
Sign in with your Indeed account, open your profile, go to Contributions, find the review and choose delete or edit. Deletion is immediate and the employer is not told who removed it. If you only need to change a detail, edit instead of deleting, because of the one-review-per-year limit.
No. An employer can ask, but cannot require it, condition a reference or payment on it, or threaten you over it. Pressure of that kind breaks Glassdoor’s guidelines, can amount to retaliation under labour law where the review concerns working conditions, and is treated as review suppression under the FTC rule.
If you wrote it, yes, from your Contributions page. If it was written about your company, no: you can only flag it, and Glassdoor removes it only where it breaks a Community Guideline. Negativity on its own is not a violation.
No. The two review streams are moderated separately even though they appear in the same Employer Center. A review posted on both sites has to be flagged on both, and Indeed applies different rules, including a ban on naming anyone at any level.
A service can file the same flag you can. If the review does not break a guideline, no service can remove it, and any guarantee is a refund policy. Legitimate firms earn their fee on campaigns, subpoena fights and suppression, not on a relationship with Glassdoor that does not exist.
Claim the profile, sign in through Indeed, and read the review against the guidelines rather than against your feelings. If it names a non-executive, leaks confidential information, uses prohibited language, comes from a non-employee, duplicates another review, or is part of a fake campaign, flag it under that category with the words quoted and nothing else, and expect an answer within 72 business hours. If it is a real employee’s honest opinion, it is staying: respond briefly for the next candidate, invite more reviews without steering them, fix what it describes, and build out the results around it.
Do not hunt for the author, do not threaten, and do not pay anyone who promises deletion. The reviews that come down are the ones that broke a rule, and no amount of money changes which rule was broken.