Reputation management for lawyers starts with a simple fact: prospective clients check an attorney’s name before they call. They see Google reviews, Avvo reviews and ratings, Martindale-Hubbell, Justia and Lawyers.com profiles, and sometimes a state bar discipline page or a news story about an old case. A personal injury firm with 40 reviews competes against one with 900, and a solo practitioner with a single disciplinary record can find it ranking above their own website.
Lawyers also face limits other businesses do not. Confidentiality rules restrict what an attorney can say when answering a former client’s review, and state advertising rules govern how testimonials and endorsements can be used. That makes law firm reputation management a mix of three jobs: getting more genuine reviews from satisfied clients, challenging reviews that break platform rules, and managing search results that cannot be removed.
The nine companies below cover all three jobs. Some are ORM agencies with dedicated attorney practices, one is a law firm that handles content removal and defamation work, and others are review platforms and legal marketing agencies with review tools built in. If a client or competitor has published something false about you, our list of internet defamation lawyers and content removal firms goes deeper into the legal side.
| Company | Best For | Pricing Model |
| Erase | Attorneys with harmful search results or rule-breaking reviews | Pay when results are delivered; quote-based |
| Reputation Rhino | Lawyers who want legal directory coverage | Quote-based |
| Minc Law | Defamation and removal matters that need an attorney | Case-based; free case review |
| Reputation Pros | Partners facing sustained negative coverage | Monthly retainer; quote-based |
| Birdeye | Firms that need many more Google reviews | Subscription; quote-based |
| Scorpion | Firms that want reviews inside a full marketing program | Quote-based |
| Status Labs | High-profile attorneys and firms | Quote-based |
| Reputation X | Partners who need knowledge panel and Wikipedia work | Quote-based |
| ReputationDefender | Lawyers who also want personal data removed | Quote-based |
Erase Technologies, LLC has operated since 2009 from offices in Miami, Florida and Burlington, Ontario, and lists lawyers among the professionals it serves. Its work is organized as reputation management (authority building, suppression and monitoring), content removal (search results, news articles, court records, mugshots, complaint sites and personal information) and review removal on Google, Indeed, Glassdoor, Trustpilot and more than 15 other platforms, with policy-violation takedowns filed directly with each platform.
For a firm, the most common use is a review that was posted by a non-client, a competitor or someone the firm declined to represent, or a review that discloses private information. These often break the host site’s policies and can be reported with evidence. For results that cannot come down, Erase’s four-phase process (Audit, Remove, Suppress, Monitor) moves to building stronger pages that push the result off page one.
Erase reports more than 10,000 clients served, over 100,000 reviews and URLs removed across 2,000+ platforms, and 99% of targeted results suppressed within six months, with 59% within three months. These are Erase’s own figures. The company has a BBB A+ rating and an Inc. 5000 listing, offers a free assessment reviewed within 24 hours, and says clients pay only when results are delivered.
The limitation: Erase is not a law firm, so a matter that needs a demand letter or a defamation suit should go to licensed counsel, such as Minc Law below.
Reputation Rhino is headquartered on 5th Avenue in New York, with a second office in Wesley Chapel, Florida. It runs a dedicated attorney reputation management service that covers the legal directories most firms worry about: Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Lawyers.com, Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers and FindLaw, along with Google, Yelp and Facebook.
The service combines monitoring, response drafting, collection of positive feedback, SEO-based suppression, content creation and media relations. The company says its team includes attorneys alongside marketers and PR staff, which helps when response language has to respect confidentiality rules.
Reputation Rhino appeared on the 2025 Inc. 5000 and offers a money-back guarantee. Pricing is quote-based and depends on project complexity. It is a service firm rather than software, so firms that only need automated review requests will pay for more than they use.
Minc Law is a Cleveland, Ohio law firm founded by Aaron Minc that focuses on online defamation, content removal and internet harassment. Its practice covers defamation cases, removal of consumer reviews and online content, investigations to identify anonymous posters, reputation monitoring and crisis PR.
Minc says it has assisted more than 3,500 clients, removed over 200,000 pieces of damaging content and litigated more than 350 cases in 26 states and 5 countries. Because it is a law firm, it can send demand letters, pursue court orders and file suits when a platform will not act on a report.
Best for: attorneys targeted by false statements from a former client, opposing party or anonymous poster. Minc offers a free case review, then paid consultations and case-based fees. It is not the right choice for routine review generation.
Reputation Pros is based in Miami and led by founder and CEO Scott Keever. It works for individuals and organizations, and lists law firms among the businesses it serves. Services include suppression and removal of negative content, creation of positive content, review monitoring and management, crisis consulting and AI reputation work aimed at answers in ChatGPT and Gemini.
The firm’s approach is to replace damaging assets with high-authority content built to rank and hold position. That suits a partner whose name returns a disciplinary article, a lawsuit report or a long forum thread. Reputation Pros states that it has worked with more than 700 clients.
Pricing is a monthly retainer; the site gives a range of roughly $2,500 to $10,000 per month depending on complexity. That makes it a larger commitment than review software, and suppression campaigns typically take months to show stable results.
Birdeye is a reputation and customer experience platform with a product track for legal practices. Firms send review requests by text or email after a matter closes, and clients can post on Google, Facebook and other sites in two clicks. The platform also manages directory listings, drafts AI replies, and handles messaging, chat and surveys from one inbox.
Birdeye says more than 1,200 law firms use it and shares case studies such as a firm moving from 2 to over 1,000 Google reviews. Those are vendor-selected results, but they show what consistent requests at intake and case close can do.
Birdeye fits personal injury, family and criminal defense firms where review volume drives calls. It does not challenge search results, and pricing is provided after a demo.
Scorpion, led by founder and CEO Rustin Kretz, describes itself as a law firm marketing agency with more than 25 years in legal marketing. Reviews are part of its RevenueMAX platform, which automates review requests and drafts AI responses alongside SEO, paid ads and intake reporting.
Scorpion states that it is Clio’s preferred marketing provider and Google’s largest Legal Services Ads partner. For firms using Local Services Ads, where review count and rating affect visibility, that combination is relevant.
The trade-off is scope. Scorpion is a full marketing engagement, so a firm that only wants reputation help will be buying more than it needs. Pricing is set after a consultation.
Status Labs was founded in 2012, is led by CEO Darius Fisher and COO Jesse Boskoff, and runs offices in Austin, New York, Los Angeles, Miami, London and Hamburg. It handles company and personal reputation management, SEO and generative engine optimization for how a name appears in AI search tools.
The firm says it screens prospective clients and accepts only those with legitimate goals and verifiable facts. For a managing partner or a trial lawyer in the news, that means a team that will work on page-one results and AI answers together.
Status Labs does not publish a legal-specific service page or pricing, and its engagements are sized for high-profile clients rather than small firms.
Reputation X has been in business since 2005 and is based in Austin, Texas, operating under Obtainium Ventures LLC. It offers search repair (removal, suppression and correct-the-record work), Google Knowledge Panel claiming and creation, Wikipedia services, reputation SEO and AI search management.
Knowledge panel work is useful for attorneys who are often confused with someone of the same name, or whose panel pulls in an outdated firm or photo. Reputation X reports more than 1,000 clients in over 100 countries.
Pricing is quote-based after a free assessment. It does not run review request automation, so pair it with a review platform if volume is the issue.
ReputationDefender, now part of the Norton family of brands, has operated since 2006 and reports more than 10,000 clients. It offers online content suppression for professionals, concierge digital security that removes personal data from data brokers and people-search sites, and a VIP service for sensitive situations.
The privacy side matters for criminal defense and family law attorneys, who sometimes deal with angry opposing parties. Removing a home address from people-search sites is a practical step alongside search work.
ReputationDefender offers a free scan and a no-obligation consultation; pricing is not public. It is aimed at individuals, so firm-wide review management is outside its scope.
Less than most people expect. ABA Formal Opinion 496, issued in 2021, says lawyers generally may not reveal information relating to a representation when responding to online criticism, even to correct a false review. Options it describes include not responding, asking the host site to remove the post, or posting a short reply that does not disclose client information. States apply their own versions of the confidentiality rule, so confirm the standard with your state bar’s ethics guidance. Any provider of reputation management for lawyers that drafts replies for you should know this and should run responses past you before posting.
Generally not. Discipline records published by state bars and courts are public records, and accurate news coverage of them is usually lawful. What reputation work can do is add context and competition: an up-to-date firm site, complete Avvo and Martindale profiles, published articles, speaking pages and current reviews that rank above an old record. Ask any company that promises to delete a bar record exactly how, and treat questions about expungement, sealing or reinstatement as matters for a licensed attorney.
Claim the profile, keep it complete, and ask satisfied clients to post on Avvo as well as Google. Avvo reviews can be reported when they break the site’s guidelines, for example if the reviewer was never a client. A balanced profile with many recent reviews does more than any single dispute. Check whether a vendor can monitor and report on Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Justia and Lawyers.com, not only Google.
Yes, in general terms. ABA Model Rule 7.1 prohibits false or misleading communications about a lawyer’s services, and states have adopted their own advertising rules, some of which add disclaimer requirements or limits on testimonials and claims about results. Paying for reviews or offering incentives can also create problems under both bar rules and the FTC’s rule on consumer reviews. Rules vary by state, so check with your state bar before republishing client reviews in ads or on your site.
Match the tool to the problem. Too few reviews calls for software or an agency like Birdeye or Scorpion. A rule-breaking review or harmful search result calls for a removal and suppression firm such as Erase, Reputation Rhino or Reputation Pros. Statements you believe are defamatory call for a lawyer who handles defamation, such as Minc Law. Attorney reputation management usually blends at least two of these.
Reputation management for lawyers works best when it starts with an honest diagnosis. Erase leads this list for attorneys dealing with policy-violating reviews and harmful search results, Reputation Rhino brings strong coverage of the legal directories, and Minc Law handles the matters that need litigation. Birdeye and Scorpion build review volume, while Reputation Pros, Status Labs, Reputation X and ReputationDefender cover suppression, knowledge panels and personal privacy for individual lawyers.
Keep responses within your confidentiality duties, check your state’s advertising rules before using testimonials, and measure success on review counts, ratings and what appears on page one for your name. If mugshots or arrest records are part of the picture for a client or for yourself, our guide to mugshot removal services explains how those requests work.
If you want to feature your company on this list, email us or submit a form in the Top Choices section. After a thorough assessment, we’ll decide whether it’s a valuable addition.