A red team engagement is a covert exercise: offensive operators pursue a goal, such as reaching a payment system, while your defenders are not told, so you learn whether your organization detects and responds to a realistic attack. A purple team exercise is open and collaborative: attackers and defenders sit together, run techniques one at a time and fix detection gaps on the spot. Red teaming measures how ready you are. Purple teaming makes you more ready, faster. Most programs get more from purple teaming first and add covert red teaming once detection is reasonably mature.
This guide focuses on purple team vs red team: what each is for, how each is run, what you get at the end and how to pick the right one. If you are still deciding between red teaming and a standard pentest, start with our guide to red teaming vs penetration testing, which covers that comparison and the basic team roles.
Both exercises use the same offensive skills. What differs is who knows the test is happening and what success looks like.
| Factor | Red Team | Purple Team |
| Primary goal | Test real-world detection and response against a realistic adversary | Improve detection and prevention coverage technique by technique |
| Defender awareness | Blue team not told; only a small control group knows | Blue team participates openly |
| Pace | Slow and stealthy, often weeks | Fast iterations, often days |
| Path through the environment | One or a few realistic attack paths toward an objective | Many techniques tested in turn, often from a planned list |
| Feedback timing | After the engagement, at the debrief | Immediately, during each test |
| Typical output | Narrative of the attack, timeline of detections and misses, strategic recommendations | Technique-level results, new or tuned detection rules, ATT&CK coverage changes |
| Tests people and process | Yes, including escalation and incident response decisions | Mostly tools and analyst workflow |
| Realism | High | Lower, by design |
| Detection maturity needed | Moderate to high to get value | Useful at most levels |
| Main audience for results | Leadership, CISO, board | SOC, detection engineering, IT |
A red team engagement starts with objectives and threat modeling: which adversary are we emulating and what would they want? The provider agrees rules of engagement with a small control group (often called the white team) that can pause the exercise if something goes wrong. Operators then gain access, which might involve phishing, an exposed service or a physical intrusion, establish persistence and move toward the objective while trying to stay hidden.
The defenders respond as they would to any real alert. At the end, the red team shares a timeline of every action, and the blue team compares it with what they saw. The gaps between the two timelines are the core finding. The result shows leadership not just whether controls exist but whether the organization as a whole, including people, escalation paths and incident response, works under pressure. See our list of top red teaming companies for providers.
A purple team exercise usually starts with a test plan: a list of techniques, often drawn from MITRE ATT&CK and chosen to match threats relevant to your industry. For each technique the offensive side runs it, announces it, and the defenders check whether it was logged, whether an alert fired and whether the response was right. If it was missed, the two sides work on the logging source or detection rule, then run the technique again to confirm the fix.
Teams commonly use open source tooling to structure this work. Atomic Red Team is a library of tests mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, which makes it easy to run small, repeatable techniques. VECTR is used to track red and blue team testing activities and measure detection and prevention across attack scenarios over time. Our explainer on what purple teaming is covers the format in more depth.
Purple teaming is also showing up in regulated testing. The European Central Bank’s TIBER-EU framework publishes guidance on how purple teaming is managed in the testing or closure phase of a threat-led test, a sign that collaboration after covert testing is becoming standard practice.
Purple teaming is not one fixed exercise. Providers and internal teams tend to use a few recurring formats, and knowing them helps you scope the work.
The two exercises are judged by different numbers, and mixing them up leads to disappointment.
For a red team engagement, useful measures include whether the objective was reached, time to first detection, time from detection to escalation, time to containment, and which stages of the attack were never seen. These describe organizational readiness, and they are most meaningful when compared across engagements over time.
For a purple team exercise, useful measures include the number of techniques tested, the share that were logged, alerted on and blocked, the number of new or tuned detections delivered, and the change in ATT&CK coverage from the start of the exercise to the end. These describe defensive capability, and they give detection engineers a clear list of what to build next.
Red teaming is the only way to see how your organization behaves when it does not know it is being tested. That includes whether an analyst escalates a strange alert at 2 a.m., whether help desk staff reset a password on a convincing phone call, and whether incident responders contain the right systems. It produces strong evidence for leadership and regulators about real readiness.
Purple teaming turns offensive knowledge directly into defensive improvements. Instead of a report recommending better detection of credential dumping, you leave the session with a working detection for it, tested and confirmed. It builds skills on both sides and gives detection engineers a clear backlog.
A covert red team against an organization with weak logging often ends with a predictable result: the operators reach the objective and nobody noticed. That is useful once, but expensive to learn repeatedly. Purple teaming, on the other hand, cannot tell you how your people respond to a surprise, because everyone knows the test is happening.
[EXPERT QUOTE: White Knight Labs, John Stigerwalt, on how to tell whether an organization is ready for a covert red team or should start with purple team exercises, and what the first red team usually reveals]
Many mature programs alternate: a covert red team engagement reveals gaps, a purple team replay of the same attack path fixes them, and the next red team tests whether the fixes hold. Between those, regular purple team sessions and continuous tools such as breach and attack simulation keep detection coverage from drifting.
For providers that specialize in collaborative work, see our list of top purple teaming providers.
Usually not. Purple teaming is a way of working where red team operators and blue team defenders collaborate. Some organizations assign a coordinator role, but the exercise relies on both existing teams.
Often, because exercises are shorter, need less covert planning and can focus on a set list of techniques. Costs still depend on scope, duration and the seniority of the operators involved.
Yes, and it is one of the most valuable ways to use one. Replaying the red team’s attack path with defenders present turns each missed step into a tested detection.
Most do not need one early on. A regular pentest, basic detection coverage and purple team sessions usually deliver more value until detection and response are mature enough to make a covert test informative.
Red teaming and purple teaming use the same attacker skills for different purposes. A red team tests whether your organization would catch and stop a realistic adversary. A purple team improves your ability to do that, one technique at a time. Use purple teaming to build detection coverage and red teaming to prove it holds when nobody knows the test is coming.
Read our comparison of red teaming vs penetration testing, compare top red teaming companies and purple teaming providers, or browse every guide and list in our penetration testing hub.