Compare the 10 best Zapier alternatives for 2027, from Make and n8n to Power Automate and Workato, with verified pricing, task limits and who each tool suits.
Zapier is still the default for no-code automation, and it has earned that spot. It claims connections to more than 9,000 apps, its editor is easy to learn, and it now handles AI steps, code, Tables, Forms and MCP under one account. The Free plan is $0 and includes 100 tasks per month, but it is limited to two-step Zaps. Multi-step Zaps start on the Professional plan, which costs $29.99 per month billed monthly or $19.99 per month billed yearly for 750 tasks. The Team plan starts at $103.50 per month billed monthly or $69 per month billed yearly for 2,000 tasks and up to 25 users.
The friction usually comes from the task meter. Zapier counts every successful action step as a task (triggers, filters and Paths steps do not count), so a five-action Zap that runs 1,000 times uses 5,000 tasks. At 5,000 tasks a month, Professional climbs to $133.50 per month on monthly billing. Pay-per-task overage keeps Zaps running once you hit your limit, but Zapier says those tasks are billed at a higher rate than your base subscription. Since AI steps, code and SDK calls now draw on the same task pool, heavier AI use pushes costs up too.
That is why teams look elsewhere. Some want cheaper volume, some want to self-host for data control, some need enterprise governance, and some only need simple personal automations. The ten tools below cover each of those needs, and every price was checked on the vendor’s own pricing page in October 2026.
Zapier Alternatives At A Glance
Tool
Starting Price
Best For
Standout Feature
Make
Free; Core from $9/mo (annual)
Visual, high-volume workflows on a budget
10,000 credits on Core with minute-level scheduling
n8n
Free self-hosted; Starter from $20/mo (annual)
Technical teams and AI agent builders
Pricing per workflow execution, not per step
Microsoft Power Automate
$15/user/mo (Premium, paid yearly)
Microsoft 365 organizations
Cloud flows plus desktop RPA in one licence
Workato
Quote only
Enterprise IT and governed AI automation
17,000+ claimed connectors with unlimited users
Tray.ai
Quote only (iPaaS)
Enterprises building integrations and agents
30-day trial with 1 million tasks
IFTTT
Free; Starter from $2.09/mo (annual)
Personal, smart home and solo automations
100,000 credits for $13.99/mo on annual Pro+
Activepieces
Free; Plus $20/mo flat
Open source fans who want a simple builder
One credit per run, whatever the step count
Pabbly Connect
Free; Standard from $14/mo (3-year)
Price-sensitive SMBs with heavy volume
Triggers and internal steps never count as tasks
Integrately
Free; Starter from $19.99/mo (annual)
Non-technical users who want ready-made automations
20 million+ one-click automations
Albato
Free; Pro from $15/mo (annual)
SMBs and SaaS companies needing embedded integrations
White-label embedded iPaaS option
Best Zapier Alternatives For 2027
1. Make — Visual Scenarios With 10,000 Credits From $9 A Month
Make (formerly Integromat) is the alternative most buyers compare first. Instead of Zapier’s top-to-bottom list of steps, you build “scenarios” on a visual canvas, with routers, filters, iterators and error handlers drawn as branches. Make advertises 3,500+ apps out of the box, plus AI agents and building by prompt or through MCP. Since August 2026 its billing unit is the credit: most actions consume one credit, while some AI features use more.
The Free plan includes 1,000 credits per month with a 15-minute minimum interval between runs. At the 10,000-credit tier, Core costs $10.59 per month billed monthly or $9 per month billed annually, and adds unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute and Make API access. Pro costs $18.82 per month (or $16 annually) and adds priority execution, custom variables and full-text log search. Teams costs $34.12 per month (or $29 annually) and adds team roles and shared templates. Enterprise is custom. Extra credits cost 25% more than plan credits, per Make’s November 2025 pricing update.
The case against Zapier is mostly price per unit of work. Ten thousand Make credits cost less per month than 750 Zapier tasks on monthly billing, and the canvas makes complex branching easier to read than a long linear Zap. Where Make falls short is approachability and catalogue size: the canvas takes longer to learn, and Zapier’s app directory is larger, so check that your niche tools have native Make modules first. Because Make bills per action rather than per run, estimate credits from a real scenario before you commit.
Make suits operations teams, agencies and marketers who run many multi-step workflows and are comfortable with a visual builder.
2. n8n — Unlimited Steps Per Execution And A Self-Hosted Option
n8n is a fair-code workflow automation platform distributed under its Sustainable Use License, available as a managed cloud service or as a self-hosted Community Edition from GitHub. It is popular with developers and AI builders because it mixes visual nodes with JavaScript and Python code, and it ships agent, MCP and AI nodes as standard. We cover the head-to-head in detail in our n8n vs Zapier comparison.
Cloud pricing is per workflow execution, with unlimited steps inside each one. Starter costs $24 per month billed monthly or $20 per month billed annually for 2,500 executions and 5 concurrent executions. Pro costs $60 per month (or $50 annually) for 10,000 executions, up to 50 concurrent executions, admin roles and 7 days of insights. Business, at $960 per month billed monthly, is self-hosted only and includes 40,000 executions, SSO, Git version control and queue mode. Enterprise is quoted. Both cloud plans come with a free trial and no credit card.
The execution model is the big win over Zapier. A 15-step workflow that runs once is one n8n execution but would be up to 15 Zapier tasks, so long workflows get much cheaper. Self-hosting also keeps data on your own infrastructure. The trade-off is effort: n8n expects more technical comfort, self-hosting means you handle servers, updates and uptime, and its native integration list is shorter than Zapier’s, so you will use the HTTP Request node more often.
n8n is the right fit for technical teams, AI agent projects and companies with data residency rules. If n8n itself is not quite right, see our roundup of n8n alternatives.
Power Automate is Microsoft’s automation service inside the Power Platform. It covers cloud flows between apps, desktop flows (robotic process automation) that click through legacy software, Copilot for building flows in natural language, and process and task mining. Microsoft says more than 1,400 prebuilt, certified connectors are available, and it works inside Excel, OneDrive and Teams.
Pricing is per user or per bot, paid yearly. Power Automate Premium costs $15.00 per user per month and includes cloud flows, attended desktop flows, standard, premium and custom connectors, and process mining with 50 MB of storage. Power Automate Process costs $150.00 per bot per month for unattended desktop automation, and Hosted Process costs $215.00 per bot per month to run on a Microsoft-hosted virtual machine. A Process Mining add-on is $5,000.00 per tenant per month. A 30-day free trial is available. Microsoft notes that the published prices are for marketing purposes and actual pricing is shown at checkout.
For companies already on Microsoft 365, Power Automate beats Zapier on fit. Per-user pricing removes the task meter for most cloud flows (within service limits), it uses the same identity and admin controls as the rest of Microsoft, and Zapier has no equivalent to desktop RPA. It falls short outside the Microsoft world: the designer is less friendly for non-technical users, licensing is harder to understand, and Zapier’s catalogue covers far more SaaS apps.
It suits Microsoft-centric organizations, IT-led automation programs and anyone who needs to automate desktop software that has no API.
4. Workato — Governed Enterprise Automation With Unlimited Users
Workato describes itself as a control and execution platform to govern AI, connect apps and data, and orchestrate workflows and agents. It claims connections to more than 17,000 apps, APIs, databases, files and MCP servers, and its product line includes Enterprise MCP, app and data MCP servers, and multi-agent tooling. Centralized identity, policy, approvals, observability and cost controls are part of the pitch.
Workato does not publish prices. Its pricing page lists four editions (Standard, Business MCP, Enterprise MCP and Workato ONE) and offers quotes and demos. The model combines an edition with usage-based consumption tracked by capability, such as workflows, API management and event streams. Workspaces and users are unlimited, and each edition includes set amounts of concurrency and on-premises agents. Optional add-ons include advanced security and governance, Private Link and extra concurrency.
Workato beats Zapier where governance and scale matter: cross-department automation owned by IT, deep ERP and data integrations, on-premises agents, and controls over AI agents and MCP traffic. Unlimited users also removes the seat cap that Zapier’s Team plan puts at 25. The downsides are cost and access. With no published pricing and a sales-led process, it is not something a small team can try over a weekend, and it is far more platform than most SMB workflows need.
Workato suits mid-market and enterprise companies that want one governed platform for integrations, workflows and AI agents.
5. Tray.ai — Enterprise iPaaS With No Per-User Or Per-Connection Fees
Tray.ai calls itself an enterprise orchestration platform for data and AI. Tray iPaaS combines integration, process automation, API management, the Merlin Agent Builder for no-code agents and an Agent Gateway for MCP. A separate product, Tray Helix, is a governed runtime for apps built with AI. Tray lists 700+ services plus “any API,” supports both low-code and code-based building, and cites SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR compliance.
Tray iPaaS plans (Pro, Team and Enterprise) are quote-based and marked “sized to your needs.” Usage is measured in tasks, with no per-user, per-connection or per-runtime fees. Committing to an annual volume gives a fixed yearly cost, and overages are settled at a true-up. The only published figure is for Helix Builder Edition, which starts at $50 per month. The free trial runs 30 days and includes 1 million tasks on Tray iPaaS with no card required.
Compared with Zapier, Tray offers stronger tooling for complex data integration, governed agent building and team-scale development, and the trial is generous enough to test real production volume. It falls short on transparency and simplicity: you will not know the price until you talk to sales, its connector list is far smaller than Zapier’s, and the platform is built for integration teams, not individual business users.
Tray.ai fits enterprises with dedicated integration or RevOps engineers who need APIs, data syncs and agents in one place.
6. IFTTT — 1,000+ Services For Less Than $3 A Month
IFTTT (“If This Then That”) is the long-running consumer automation service built around Applets. It connects 1,000+ services and devices, with a strong focus on smart home gear, mobile and social apps, plus small-business uses like tracking billable hours. Recent additions include AI steps in Applets (agent, summarizer, translator), AI-generated Applets, multi-action Applets, filters and an MCP server so assistants like Claude can run your Applets.
IFTTT uses credits. Free includes 1,000 credits per month with hourly Applet polling. Starter costs $2.99 per month billed monthly or $2.09 per month billed annually ($25.08 a year) for 5,000 credits and 15-minute polling. Pro costs $7.99 per month or $5.49 annually ($65.88 a year) for 20,000 credits and 5-minute polling. Pro+ costs $19.99 per month or $13.99 annually ($167.88 a year) for 100,000 credits and adds multiple accounts per service. IFTTT says all core features are on every plan.
IFTTT wins on cost and on device coverage. For simple triggers like “save new photos to Drive” or “turn on the lights when I get home,” it is far cheaper than Zapier, and its catalogue is built around the smart home and mobile devices that business automation tools tend to underserve. It is the wrong tool for business process automation, though. Polling is slower even on paid plans, branching and data handling are basic, and there are no team controls comparable to Zapier’s shared Zaps and SSO.
IFTTT suits individuals, creators and very small businesses whose automations are short, personal or device-based.
7. Activepieces — MIT-Licensed Open Source With One Credit Per Run
Activepieces is an open source automation platform whose Community Edition is released under the MIT license, with enterprise features under a separate commercial license. Its builder looks and feels close to Zapier, which makes it one of the easiest open source tools for non-developers. It includes flows, agents, tables, chat-to-automation and MCP access, and its GitHub README says all 280+ pieces (integrations) are available as MCP servers. It can run in the cloud or on your own servers.
Cloud plans are flat. Free includes 1,000 credits per month, unlimited flows and up to 5 users. Plus costs $20 per month billed monthly or $16 per month billed yearly for 10,000 credits, then $0.007 per extra credit. Team costs $200 per month or $166 per month billed yearly for 50,000 credits, unlimited projects, 25 users and SSO. Ultimate is custom and adds on-premises or air-gapped deployment. Each run costs one credit regardless of how many steps it has; AI steps cost 2, 10 or 20 credits depending on the model.
Per-run pricing is the main advantage over Zapier: a ten-step flow costs the same as a two-step flow, and 10,000 runs for $20 a month is a fraction of what the same volume costs on Zapier Professional. The permissive MIT license also makes self-hosting simple from a legal point of view. The catch is integration depth. With a few hundred pieces against Zapier’s thousands, you are more likely to hit a missing app or trigger and need a custom HTTP call or to write your own piece.
Activepieces suits startups and IT teams that want an open source, self-hostable tool that business users can still pick up quickly.
8. Pabbly Connect — An Unlimited Tasks Plan From $59 A Month
Pabbly Connect is a budget-focused integration platform from Pabbly, the company behind a suite of billing, email and form tools. It supports 2,000+ applications and includes multi-step workflows, routers, iterators, delays, scheduling, an email parser, JavaScript and Python code steps, AI agents, human-in-the-loop approvals and MCP tooling. Pabbly says it holds SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001:2022 certifications.
The Free plan includes 100 tasks per month and two-step workflows. Standard (10,000 tasks per month) costs $19 per month billed monthly, $16 per month on yearly billing, $15 on two-year billing and $14 on three-year billing. Unlimited (no task cap) costs $79 per month billed monthly, $69 yearly, $65 on two-year billing and $59 on three-year billing. Both paid plans include unlimited workflows and team members. Pabbly also sells one-time lifetime plans with fixed monthly task allowances.
Pabbly’s counting rules are its strongest argument against Zapier. Only action steps count as tasks; triggers and internal tools such as filters, routers, formatters, schedules and iterators are free, and polling checks are not charged. Add an Unlimited plan and the task meter disappears entirely. The weaknesses are in polish and reach: the interface is less refined, the app catalogue is smaller than Zapier’s, and the best prices need multi-year prepayment.
Pabbly Connect suits SMBs, agencies and solo operators who run high volumes of fairly standard workflows and want predictable, low costs.
9. Integrately — 20 Million+ One-Click Automations For 1,500+ Apps
Integrately is built for people who do not want to design automations from scratch. It advertises 20 million+ ready-made automations across 1,500+ apps, so most common workflows can be switched on in one click and then adjusted. It also supports multi-step workflows, webhooks, filters, if/else branching, search and data modification steps, a scheduler, iterators and auto-retry.
Free includes 100 tasks, 5 automations, single-step workflows and a 15-minute update time. Starter costs $29.99 per month billed monthly or $19.99 per month billed annually for 2,000 tasks, 20 automations, 3 premium apps and 5-minute updates. Professional costs $49 per month or $39 annually for 10,000 tasks, unlimited automations and 2-minute updates. Growth costs $124 per month or $99 annually for 30,000 tasks and unlimited users, and Business costs $299 per month or $239 annually for 150,000 tasks. At the time of checking, Integrately was running a first-month offer of $5 on premium plans.
Against Zapier, Integrately gives more tasks per dollar: Starter’s 2,000 tasks cost the same as Zapier Professional’s 750 on monthly billing, and Professional’s 10,000 tasks cost $49. The one-click library also gets non-technical users running faster. It falls short on advanced logic, AI and code features, team governance and catalogue size, and the lower tiers cap premium apps and the number of automations.
Integrately suits small business owners and marketers who want common app-to-app automations running quickly without building them step by step.
10. Albato — No-Code Automation Plus A White-Label Embedded iPaaS
Albato is a no-code automation platform with 1,000+ ready-to-use apps and AI features including Albato AI and AI agents. It also sells Albato Embedded, a white-label embedded iPaaS that lets software companies offer 1,000+ native integrations inside their own product, for both their users and AI agents. That second product is unusual among Zapier alternatives in this price range.
Albato counts transactions. Free includes 100 transactions, 5 active automations, 2 steps per automation and 15-minute updates. Pro costs $22 per month billed monthly or $15 per month billed annually for 1,000 transactions, unlimited automations and steps, data migration, parallel execution and 5-minute updates, with a slider up to 2 million transactions. Teams costs $93 per month or $65 annually from 5,000 transactions, with 5 team seats, shared workspaces, priority support and 3-minute updates. Custom plans are quoted. Albato says annual billing saves up to 30%.
Albato beats Zapier on entry price for multi-step work, and its white-label embedded product gives SaaS companies a route that general-purpose automation tools rarely package this way. Built-in data migration (moving historical records between apps) is also handy for one-off projects. The trade-offs are a smaller app catalogue, slower update intervals on lower plans, and a smaller ecosystem of templates and community help than Zapier.
Albato suits SMBs that want affordable multi-step automation and SaaS companies that need native integrations for their own customers.
How To Choose A Zapier Alternative
How Does Each Tool Count Usage?
This is the question that decides most switches. Zapier charges per successful action, so long Zaps eat tasks quickly. n8n charges per execution and Activepieces per run, regardless of step count. Pabbly Connect skips triggers and internal steps, and Make, IFTTT and Albato use their own credit or transaction units. Take your three busiest Zaps, count the steps and monthly runs, and price them on each shortlisted tool. That exercise usually tells you more than any comparison table, and it is the clearest way to find something cheaper than Zapier for your actual workload.
Are All Your Apps Supported Natively?
Zapier’s directory is the largest on this list, so list every app your Zaps touch and check each one in the alternative’s catalogue, including the specific triggers and actions you rely on. A tool can “support” an app but lack the one trigger you need. If a gap exists, check whether the platform has a good HTTP or webhook module and whether your team is comfortable using it.
Do You Need To Self-Host?
If customer data must stay on your own infrastructure, your shortlist narrows to self-hosted automation options: n8n (fair-code, Sustainable Use License) and Activepieces (MIT-licensed Community Edition), with Workato’s on-premises agents and Activepieces Ultimate covering hybrid or air-gapped needs. Remember that self-hosting moves the cost from a subscription to engineering time for setup, upgrades, backups and monitoring. For a broader look at how developer-oriented and agent-focused tools compare with Zapier, see our Composio vs n8n vs Zapier breakdown.
Who Will Build And Maintain The Workflows?
Be honest about skills. Integrately, IFTTT and Pabbly Connect are friendly to non-technical users. Make sits in the middle: very capable, but the canvas takes practice. n8n, Workato and Tray.ai reward technical builders and integration teams. If marketing or operations staff will own the automations, picking a developer tool to save money can backfire when nobody can fix a broken workflow.
How Much Governance Do You Need?
For a team of five, shared folders and a login are enough. For a company with hundreds of automations, you will want SSO, role-based access, audit trails, environments and version control. Power Automate, Workato and Tray.ai are built for that level, and n8n’s Business and Enterprise plans add SSO and Git-based version control. Check the plan that includes these features, not the entry price.
How Will You Handle AI Steps And Agents?
Most workflow automation tools now include AI steps or agents, but they bill them differently. Activepieces charges 2 to 20 credits per AI step depending on the model, Make says some AI features use more than one credit, and Make lets all paid plans connect their own AI provider. Zapier draws AI steps from the same task pool as everything else. If AI calls will be a large share of your runs, model that cost separately and check whether bringing your own API keys is allowed.
Conclusion
Zapier remains the easiest place to start and has the widest app coverage, so it is still a sensible default for small teams with modest volume. The case for switching grows with usage. Once your Zaps run many steps thousands of times a month, Zapier pricing climbs fast, and that is when the alternatives pay off.
For most teams, the make vs zapier decision is the first one to test: Make offers a visual builder and far more volume per dollar. Technical teams and anyone who needs data control should look at n8n or Activepieces, Microsoft shops should evaluate Power Automate, and large organizations needing governance should talk to Workato or Tray.ai. For simple, cheap automations, IFTTT, Pabbly Connect, Integrately and Albato each undercut Zapier for specific use cases.
Whichever direction you lean, run a pilot. Rebuild two or three of your most important Zaps on the shortlisted tool, measure real usage for a month, and compare the bill and the maintenance effort before migrating everything.
