Last updated: November 12, 2026
The best cost segregation firms for new construction and build-to-rent in 2027 are KBKG, Engineered Tax Services and Duffy+Duffy, followed by Plante Moran, Capstan Tax Strategies and Madison SPECS. KBKG leads for developers who want depth on construction cost records, Engineered Tax Services for pairing studies with 45L and 179D, and Duffy+Duffy for LEED and green building projects.
New construction is the best time to do a study. Contractor pay applications, change orders and invoices let the engineer price each component directly instead of estimating, which makes the study more precise and more defensible. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made 100% bonus depreciation permanent for qualifying property acquired after January 19, 2025, so reclassified components can often be deducted in the first year on the federal return.
This list is for developers, build-to-rent investors and owner-builders. For estimating partners, see our list of construction cost estimating services.
| Firm | Location | Founded | Specialty | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. KBKG | Pasadena, CA (seven US offices) | 1999 | Tax credits and incentives with engineered studies | Developers with detailed cost records |
| 2. Engineered Tax Services | West Palm Beach, FL | 2001 | Licensed engineering firm for specialty tax | Developers stacking incentives |
| 3. Duffy+Duffy | Westlake, OH (Novi, MI office) | 2002 | Cost segregation only | LEED and green projects |
| 4. Plante Moran | Southfield, MI | 1924 | Michigan-based accounting and advisory firm | Owner-builders |
| 5. Capstan Tax Strategies | Jenkintown, PA | 2015 | Engineering-driven specialty tax for CRE | Commercial developers |
| 6. Madison SPECS | Lakewood, NJ | 2004 | Cost segregation only, with in-house engineers | Repeat residential developers |
| 7. CSSI | Baton Rouge, LA | Not published | Engineering-based cost segregation only | Large projects |
| 8. CBIZ | Cleveland, OH | 1996 | National accounting and advisory firm | Developers who want in-house engineers |
| 9. McGuire Sponsel | Indianapolis, IN | 2007 | Specialty tax partner to CPA firms | Developers whose CPA wants a partner |
| 10. Salas O’Brien | San Jose, CA | Not published | Engineering firm with a cost segregation practice | Specialized new buildings |
We looked for firms that work from construction cost records, coordinate with developers during the build, and can pair cost segregation with energy incentives such as 45L and 179D. We also weighed experience with build-to-rent communities, which combine many similar homes.
Rankings are editorial. No firm paid to be included.
KBKG’s process starts with a review of all cost detail, including the general contractor’s applications for payment, construction invoices and change orders. It has offered cost segregation since 1999.
It also handles 45L for residential developers, and its seven US offices cover developers working in several markets.
Best for: Developers who want a study built directly from construction records.
Engineered Tax Services publishes new construction studies, such as a fitness center in Vineland, New Jersey that produced more than $2.4 million in first-year tax savings, and it also runs 45L and 179D programs.
As a licensed engineering firm, it can certify energy incentives alongside the study.
Best for: Developers who want cost segregation and energy incentives from one firm.
Duffy+Duffy focuses only on cost segregation and is known for its work on LEED-certified properties. Its team includes CPAs, estimators and construction engineers.
It provides an estimate of benefits and a flat-fee quote before work begins.
Best for: Developers of green and LEED-certified buildings.
Plante Moran’s cost segregation practice is led by a licensed Michigan builder with a construction management degree. It published a case study in which a real estate company saved about $2 million in taxes on a new building, starting from contractor invoices.
Its construction and real estate practices can support the developer through the build.
Best for: Owner-builders who want an accounting firm with construction expertise.
Capstan Tax Strategies uses degreed engineers and has completed more than 8,000 studies. It covers new construction alongside acquisitions and renovations.
It also handles tangible property regulation questions that come up as projects are placed in service in phases.
Best for: Commercial developers placing buildings in service in phases.
Madison SPECS works only on cost segregation and has handled repeat studies for residential developers. Its in-house engineers travel to document each property.
That suits build-to-rent developers delivering many similar homes or buildings.
Best for: Build-to-rent and residential developers with repeat projects.
CSSI has completed more than 20,000 studies on properties valued from $200,000 to $1.5 billion, and it also handles 179D.
It suits large ground-up commercial and mixed-use projects.
Best for: Developers of large ground-up projects.
CBIZ keeps its cost segregation engineers in-house rather than outsourcing them, which it says speeds up turnaround.
Developers already using CBIZ for accounting can keep the study in the same relationship.
Best for: Developers who want an integrated national firm.
McGuire Sponsel partners with CPA firms and conducts on-site inspections to document depreciable property, with engineers, accountants and consultants on staff.
It suits developers whose CPA wants to keep control of the return.
Best for: Developers whose CPA prefers a specialist partner.
Salas O’Brien is a large engineering firm that performs cost segregation, including studies on newly built facilities.
Its engineers understand building systems at the design level, which helps on specialized new construction.
Best for: Developers of specialized buildings with complex systems.
Ideally before or during construction, so cost records are organized to support the study.
Ask whether the firm prices components from actual invoices rather than estimates.
New buildings may qualify for 45L or 179D. See our list of 179D and 45L tax incentive firms.
Build-to-rent and multi-building projects are placed in service in phases. The study should match.
Confirm audit support.
During or right after construction, while invoices and change orders are fresh.
Yes. Each home contains appliances, finishes and site work that can move into shorter lives, and the work repeats across the community.
Generally no. Cost segregation applies to property held for rental or business use, not inventory built for sale.
Yes, though it is more precise when cost records are organized during the build.
KBKG, Engineered Tax Services and Duffy+Duffy are the strongest picks for new construction, with Plante Moran, Capstan and Madison SPECS close behind. Choose a firm early so the study is built from your own cost records.
For related lists, see our 179D and 45L tax incentive firms, multifamily cost segregation firms and cost segregation firms for single-family rentals.