The crypto universe has mushroomed since Bitcoin made headlines, sparking a surge of blockchain initiatives aimed at revolutionizing finance and technology.
Yet many ventures struggle with liquidity issues that erode investor trust.
In today’s competitive market, liquidity has evolved from a nice-to-have feature into a vital component for project success. Specialized market makers crypto provide the essential buy-and-sell volume needed to maintain smooth trading and stable pricing.
Consequently, as startups adopt robust liquidity strategies, they not only enhance market credibility but also position themselves for sustainable growth.
Market making is the activity of a company or entity that offers liquidity to a financial asset by posting both a bid and a sell price at the same time on a number of trading sites. It profits by taking the spread between the bid price and the asking price, a practice that dates back to traditional financial systems. In the case of cryptocurrencies, the practice is the same although usually much more complex due to the price volatility of the assets involved and the specific technologies involved with digital assets.
A healthy market cannot function on speculation. If the bid (the price that the buyers will purchase the asset at) minus the ask (the price at which the seller will sell the asset) is excessive, the market is unhealthy. Traders will shun the market if price action is inconsistent, potentially sending them off somewhere else.
Reducing this spread and providing continuous order books eliminates friction between regular traders. For up-and-coming blockchain ventures, this cushion of liquidity is important to sustaining the interest of the investors, especially if the market is saturated with newly minted tokens fighting to gain notice.
Liquidity is also called the blood of all tradeable assets, and that is particularly the case with crypto. If a token is illiquid with no adequate buyers and sellers ready to trade at a reasonable price, the token can have abrupt price oscillations that scare off potential participants. It can shatter the aspirations of a startup to have a stable valuation and obtain the support of long-term supporters with this sort of volatility.
Beyond price stability comes the legitimacy of liquidity. Traders feel confident that the asset is actually wanted by others if they can look at a crowded order book with lots of asks and bids. An active market also means smoother entry and exit points, something that is paramount to the needs of institutional traders who need to know they can put a lot of capital into the asset without significantly altering the price.
For the average retail trader, stable liquidity means they can jump in or out at their convenience without being charged excessive amounts of slippage.
The use of market making is well established within traditional financial systems, but the crypto environment puts a twist to this practice. Cryptos are traded on both central and decentralized sites with varying levels of requirements and pools of liquidity. It is a complex problem to deal with proper market-making on different sites with real-time analytical data, robust infrastructure, and the need to quickly adapt to fast-changing market conditions.
It’s in this dynamic environment that blockchain market-making is emerging into its own. Specialist firms have risen to the challenge with a suite of solutions that range from 24/7 management of liquidity to complex algorithmic trading. These firms usually have rosters of developers, data scientists, and quantitative analysts to craft bespoke solutions.
Their aim is simple: keep the order books healthy, keep the price action stable, and deliver stable price discovery. In the process, they act to serve as a stabilizing presence within a landscape that can, at times, feel like the Wild West.
It’s easy to think of market making merely as a way to enhance price stability within crypto startups, but the worth is deeper. For instance, normal trading activity can raise a project’s profile on well-established exchanges. Many sites rank assets by volume, liquidity, or by a combination of the two metrics. If a coin ends up at the bottom of the ranks, it might struggle to gain the sort of notice that can translate into increased popularity and increased liquidity.
Furthermore, a crypto market-making company will also gain a competitive edge while striking partnerships and listings. Exchanges will favor the token with evidence of current trade activity due to the token being a representation of actual market demand. It can translate into a project receiving the best terms of a listing and greater marketing potential.
The easier a token is to trade, the word spreads among the investing public. With the participation of increasingly more people, overall momentum is established that creates a larger base of holders that are interested in holding the token or integrating the token into other applications.
Despite the apparent advantage, crypto market making is no walkover. In part, the problem is the issue of regulatory clarity. Jurisdictions have a range of legal interpretations of digital assets and tokens, and the company’s market-making must correspond with the regional laws. The patchwork of legislation can pose a problem if a project is marketing to a global user base.
Another consideration is cost. Liquidity is obviously necessary, but startups operate with small budgets to work with. Hiring a team of traders to work exclusively with the company or hiring a third-party market maker can be out of the question, although the payoff is well worth the cost ultimately.
Transparency is also a consideration. A startup’s user base will naturally question the reasons that price stability is something that is being faked out, so being transparent about the purpose and intent of the market-making efforts is key to trust being maintained.
Consider a brand-new blockchain payment platform that introduced a native utility token upon launching. At first, the token started with a bang of popularity, but the trading volumes plummeted soon with the fading of the excitement. In the absence of a strong base of traders with regular activity, the price of the token fluctuated wildly between days, posing a threat to both the traders and investors and the potential end-users of the token as a medium of exchange.
With the alliance of a specialized company to provide regular buy and sell orders, the project stabilized the order book and regained the trust of the traders and investors. With the passage of time, with regular liquidity drawing traders to the token, the token price stabilized at its intrinsic value of the service of the platform itself.
Another case could include a decentralized finance (DeFi) company that listed its governance token both on centralized and decentralized exchanges. In the absence of consolidated liquidity, price divergences between the various sites occurred that made the overall market unsure of the token price.
An orderly market-making approach facilitated price harmonization of the token and made the token find the same kind of liquidity no matter where the investor traded. It made the market feel equitable and stable, drawing institutions that might have shunned the token due to the threat of arbitrage.
The importance of market making will also grow greater. With blockchain technology maturing and increasingly being woven into the everyday lives of companies, the number of emerging assets and new tokens is bound to overwhelm the market. All this will hone the competition, making the imperative to excel with stable liquid markets all the greater for emerging ventures.
We are also seeing a flood of decentralized exchanges, automated market makers, and novel solutions to liquidity by smart contracts. All this can redefine the supply of liquidity with the potential to disseminate the work of market-making to entire networks of participants and communities.
Nonetheless, the fundamentals will not change. Liquidity will lead to liquidity, and the projects that are aware of this cyclical dynamic can use that to accelerate adoption. We will have more techniques and instruments at our disposal, but the secret to a healthy market – the narrow spreads, the stable order books, the transparent behavior – will not change.
With the passage of time, we will have increasingly robust services, innovative frameworks of technology, and a growing mania about being compliant. Startups that are quick to deploy professional market-making strategies will find that they are well-placed to win the attention of both the end-users and the investors.
Blockchain startups are confronted with a complex landscape of high aspirations and intense competition. Having a stable healthy market is perhaps the best way to earn credibility and find supporters that can carry a project’s steam ahead.
Market making, a niche activity borrowed from the traditional financial markets, is at the forefront of the success of the majority of crypto ventures today. With roles that include providing the necessary liquidity for price stabilizations, it enables the startups to have a desirable stable product to present to the world.
While the path to sustained liquidity is filled with traps such as budget restrictions and regulator hurdles, the payoff is well worth the trouble. Successful market-making projects are then rewarded with tighter spreads, increased visibility, and greater trust among their communities.
In this environment, a robust liquidity management approach is no longer a nicety—it’s a stealth driver of growth that can catapult a token into the mainstream. If crypto projects can learn to envision the potential of market-making earlier on, they can set themselves on a smoother trajectory to sustained success.