This list is for founders and product teams who built an app with Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, v0 or a similar tool, got real users, and now need engineers to make it safe and maintainable. The prototype works in a demo, but nobody has checked the auth rules, the database permissions, the secrets or what happens under load. A cleanup or rescue engagement closes that gap before it turns into an incident. If you are still weighing the options, start with our guide on whether to rescue or rebuild a vibe-coded MVP.
We checked every company on its own website in October 2026 and included only firms that publish a named service for auditing, fixing, hardening or refactoring AI-generated code. Several well-known product studios we looked at do excellent modernization work but do not offer a dedicated vibe code rescue service, so they are not on this list. Process details, timelines and prices below come from each firm’s own service page. For the wider landscape of tools and services, see our Vibe Coding & No-Code hub.
| Company | Headquarters | Best For | Core Services |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wavect | Ampass, Austria | Founders who want a fixed-price audit with a keep, harden or rebuild call | Vibe code audit, full rescue, CI and monitoring |
| Metacto | Not listed on its site | Funded teams that need production readiness in 30 days | Free 48-hour audit, fixed-price rescue, test suite and CI |
| Pragmatic Coders | Kraków, Poland | Startups and fintechs that want a free code assessment first | Code audit, security hardening, QA and bug fixing |
| *instinctools | Potomac, USA and Stuttgart, Germany | Companies that also want to set up vibe coding properly in-house | Vibe code audit, cleanup sprints, enablement program |
| Redwerk | Kyiv, Ukraine and Tallinn, Estonia | Regulated apps that need HIPAA or GDPR review | Code cleanup, security audit, refactoring |
| Innowise | Warsaw, Poland (US entity in Boston) | Larger apps that need a big bench of specialists | AI code audit, refactoring, QA automation, CI/CD |
| SoftTeco | Offices in Poland, Lithuania, US, UK and more | Teams that want their own developers trained during the cleanup | Audit, automated testing, CI/CD, team training |
| WZ-IT | Werl, Germany | EU companies moving a Lovable app to EU or self-hosted infrastructure | Production readiness audit, Supabase hardening, managed operations |
| Red Leg Dev | Lakeland, Florida, USA | Lovable and Supabase apps with row-level security gaps | Supabase RLS audit, policy tests, secrets cleanup |
| Chudovo | Offices in Germany, Estonia, UK, Ukraine and US | Small apps that need a fast written audit and a short cleanup | Code audit, refactoring, CI/CD and deployment fixes |
Wavect is an Austrian software studio founded in 2018 and based in Ampass, Tyrol. It cites 75+ products shipped. Its Vibe Code Rescue service is built for apps made with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, v0, Windsurf or Claude Code, often on Supabase, Firebase, Next.js and Vercel. The entry point is a fixed-scope Vibe Code Audit that maps the architecture, ranks findings by severity and ends with a clear recommendation: keep, harden or rebuild. Wavect says an audit typically takes a few days at a fixed fee.
The Full Rescue then fixes what the audit found: authorization on every endpoint, input validation, secrets and environment separation, payments, error paths that fail closed, a regression test suite, CI, observability and rollbacks, followed by runbooks and a handover walkthrough. Critical security fixes ship first. Work runs on a signed statement of work with a fixed price, can be cancelled weekly, and the most recent week is refunded if the client is not satisfied. Published case studies include Twinsoft AI, a vibe-coded prototype taken to enterprise pilot readiness in two weeks.
Metacto is a product development firm that says it has put 100+ projects into production across web, mobile and AI. Its Vibe Rescue service is one of the most clearly packaged offers we found. It starts with a free code audit delivered within 48 hours, followed by a free rescue plan that states what gets fixed, what gets rewritten and what gets discarded, at a fixed price. The paid phase puts senior engineers on the code with weekly demos and a production-ready target of day 30.
The scope covers architecture, security, dependencies and dead code, replacing hallucinated library calls, real auth and input validation, tests for critical paths, type checks, a CI pipeline, deployment hardening and error tracking. The page names Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Lovable, v0, Bolt, Replit Agent and Windsurf as the tools it rescues from. Metacto publishes its pricing: rescue engagements run $50,000 to $150,000 as of October 2026, and it says budgets under about $40,000 are not a fit. Its featured example is a solo founder’s B2B SaaS built with Cursor that shipped to 50+ paying customers after the rescue.
Pragmatic Coders was founded in 2014 in Kraków, Poland, and has grown to 100+ people. It is best known for fintech and digital health products, with published work for Atom Bank, the UK’s first fully digital bank, Kitopi, Frost and WithHealth. Its Vibe Coding Rescue Services sit inside its AI software development practice and are aimed at founders whose AI-built product is struggling with bugs, performance or security.
The service covers four areas: code and performance optimization (codebase audit, technical debt review and scaling), security audit and hardening (vulnerability review, patching and encryption), testing, QA and bug fixing, and UX and design improvement. The process runs from a free consultation to an assessment, a planning meeting and then implementation. The code assessment is free unless the codebase is unusually large. Teams that need a fuller handover can pair it with the firm’s separate software project takeover and DevOps services.
*instinctools has been building software since 2000 and has 400+ in-house experts, with a US headquarters in Potomac, Maryland, an EU headquarters in Stuttgart and development centers in Poland, India, Kazakhstan and Latin America. Its clients include Daimler and Burda Digital. The vibe code service has two halves: a Vibe Code Audit that reviews infrastructure, business logic, architecture, data model, code quality, security, performance and the cost-benefit of each fix, and a Vibe Coding Cleanup that restructures architecture, refactors, adds tests, fixes security issues and sets up CI/CD.
The published timeline is 1 to 2 weeks for the audit and risk assessment, about a week for a stabilization roadmap and 3 to 6 weeks of cleanup sprints. Deliverables include a vulnerability report, an architecture risk assessment, a priority matrix and documentation in a new repository. Security checks include SAST, dependency and secret scanning and SBOM generation. It works with code from Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, Windsurf, Base44 and Copilot, and also runs an enablement program for companies that want to keep vibe coding safely.
Redwerk has been writing custom software since 2005, with offices in Kyiv and Tallinn and a team it describes as 90+ senior engineers. It reports 250+ delivered projects and names Universal Music Group and Hosting.com among its clients. Its Vibe Code Cleanup offer is split into three services: cleanup (assessment plus targeted refactoring), consulting on responsible vibe coding, and a Vibe Code Security Audit that checks for vulnerabilities and compliance gaps against HIPAA and GDPR.
The process runs through review, debugging with critical bugs first, refactoring (design patterns, decoupled services, rewriting fragile components), optimization with unit and integration tests, and optional maintenance. Deliverables include an improvement roadmap, documented source code, a CI/CD pipeline and monitoring. Redwerk says a small project can get its initial assessment and critical refactoring done in 1 to 2 weeks. Published audit work includes Project Science in the US and Site Compass in Australia.
Innowise was established in 2007 and has 3,500+ IT professionals, with its FAQ placing headquarters in Warsaw and a US entity in Boston. Client logos on its site include Hays, Spar, Tietoevry and NTT Data. Its Vibe Coding Cleanup service is pitched at turning a vibe-coded application into production-ready software, and it lists Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Codex, Windsurf, Replit, Lovable and Bolt as the platforms it works with.
The work moves through six steps: a free assessment, a technical audit with issues ranked by severity, a cleanup roadmap ordered by dependency, cleanup sprints with reviewed changes and added tests, a production handoff, and optional ongoing support. The handoff package includes code, test results, deployment instructions, architecture documentation and a written list of remaining risks. Innowise says projects take from a few weeks to a few months depending on codebase size. Its testing stack includes SonarQube, Snyk, Semgrep, Cypress and Playwright.
SoftTeco was founded in 2008 with 10 people and now has about 500 employees, with offices in Warsaw, Vilnius, Kaunas, Plovdiv, Tbilisi, Wenham (Massachusetts), Loughborough and Dubai. It reports 650 projects delivered. Its Vibe Coding Cleanup Services start with a free assessment and a code audit, then move into refactoring, automated unit, integration and end-to-end tests, CI/CD pipelines and security and compliance work. It also uses AI agents to scan for anti-patterns, dead code and vulnerabilities.
What sets SoftTeco apart is the handover: deliverables include structured documentation of architecture, dependencies and workflows plus hands-on training for in-house teams, so your developers can keep the code clean afterward. The published timeline is 1 to 2 weeks for the audit, about a week for the roadmap and 3 to 6 weeks of cleanup sprints. Related case studies on the page include Melio, an MVP scaled into a B2B payment platform, and Aniware.
WZ-IT is a German IT firm in Werl, in the Ruhr Valley, founded by Timo Wevelsiep and Robin Zins. It runs managed hosting, Proxmox and AI infrastructure work, and names clients such as Stadtwerke Brühl, Golem.de and nextGYM. Its prototype-to-production service for Lovable apps takes over the GitHub repository and reviews the Supabase schema, migrations, RLS policies, auth flows, roles, edge functions, storage and secrets, then adds OWASP-oriented fixes, rate limits and input validation.
The five phases are audit, decoupling into a clean repository with separate environments, hardening, production readiness (CI/CD, tests, monitoring, logging and rollback) and optional operations. Hosting can move to self-hosted Supabase or EU servers, which matters for GDPR-sensitive apps. As of October 2026, WZ-IT lists a Production Readiness Audit from €1,490 excluding VAT, delivered in as little as 5 business days, an AI Code Review Retainer from €990 per month and Managed Code Care from €699.90 per month.
Red Leg Dev is a one-engineer practice in Lakeland, Florida, run by Matt Wagner, who describes it as having no agency layers. Its Lovable rescue service is narrow and specific: it audits every Supabase table’s data-access pattern against its current row-level security policy, closes the gaps and moves permission checks out of React and into Postgres policies and edge functions, where they cannot be bypassed from the browser.
The work also rebuilds a migration history from the current schema, moves hardcoded secrets into Supabase’s secret store and rotates exposed keys, sets up a staging Supabase project, and adds integration tests that run against the policies themselves rather than only the UI. Most rescues are stabilize-and-harden, and a rewrite is only suggested when the schema cannot be explained or the core data model is changing. As of October 2026, the audit is $1,500 flat with a two-week turnaround, and full rescues typically run $15,000 to $50,000.
Chudovo has been on the market since 2006, with 40+ full-time experts and offices in Castrop-Rauxel (Germany), Tallinn, London, Kyiv and New York. It reports 190+ completed projects, with clients including YesCare and Handwerk Connected. Its Vibe Coding Cleanup service starts every engagement with a written audit covering the codebase state, security weak spots, root causes, duplicated code, module breakdown and a prioritized plan with time and scope estimates. The initial evaluation is free.
Cleanup then addresses inconsistent code, architecture, technical debt, documentation, performance bottlenecks, security gaps, dependencies, database queries and deployment, including CI/CD. Chudovo publishes a tight schedule: 1 to 3 business days for the assessment, 2 to 3 days for the roadmap and 2 to 4 weeks of cleanup for small projects (4 to 8 weeks for mid-size). The client keeps sole ownership of the code and documentation, with optional support on a retainer.
The vibe code cleanup services above package their work differently, but their published scopes overlap heavily. Almost every engagement opens with a written audit that ranks findings by severity and ends with a fix-or-rebuild recommendation. Wavect frames it as keep, harden or rebuild, Metacto as fix, rewrite or discard, and Red Leg Dev says most rescues are stabilize-and-harden unless the data model itself is wrong. It is worth reading that recommendation closely, because it decides most of the final cost.
Security comes next. For apps on Supabase, that means reviewing row-level security on every table and moving permission checks from the frontend into the database, which both WZ-IT and Red Leg Dev describe in detail. Other common items are server-side authorization on every endpoint, input validation, moving hardcoded keys into a secret store and rotating anything exposed. These match the issues we cover in vibe coding security risks. The last layer is engineering hygiene: a regression or critical-path test suite, a CI/CD pipeline, separate staging and production environments, monitoring and rollbacks, and documentation so the next developer can work in the code.
A paid or free audit with a written, ranked report should come before any open-ended fix work. It tells you how bad things are and gives you something concrete to compare between vendors. Ask whether the audit price is fixed, how long it takes, and whether the report is yours to keep if you hire someone else for the fixes.
A Lovable app on Supabase has different failure points than a Cursor-built Next.js app on Vercel. Look for a service page that names your tools and backend, and ask for an example of a similar rescue. If you are not sure which stack your tool produced, our Lovable vs Bolt comparison explains what each one generates under the hood.
Some prototypes are worth hardening and some are cheaper to rewrite. A good partner will say so in writing, with a cost for each path. Be wary of any vendor that quotes a full rebuild before looking at the code, or one that promises to patch anything regardless of how the data model was built.
Ask for a specific list: tests, CI/CD, staging, monitoring, documentation and a written list of remaining risks. SoftTeco adds team training and Wavect adds runbooks. If you plan to keep building with AI tools, this handover is what stops the same problems from coming back.
Published prices on this list range from a €1,490 or $1,500 audit to $50,000 to $150,000 rescue engagements. Solo specialists and small firms suit narrow problems such as Supabase permissions, while large firms suit apps that need many specialists at once. Our MVP development cost guide gives useful context for what production work usually costs.
It is an engagement where engineers audit, fix, harden and refactor an app built mostly with AI coding tools so it can safely handle real users and real data. Most include a security review, tests, CI/CD and documentation.
Audits on this list take from 48 hours to two weeks. Published cleanup timelines run from 2 to 4 weeks for small projects to 3 to 6 weeks of sprints for larger ones, and Metacto targets production readiness in 30 days.
As of October 2026, published audit prices start at €1,490 (WZ-IT) and $1,500 (Red Leg Dev), and several firms offer a free first assessment. Full rescues range from $15,000 to $50,000 at Red Leg Dev and $50,000 to $150,000 at Metacto. Most other firms quote after the audit.
Yes, and many teams do. The cleanup gives you tests, CI and review rules that catch AI-generated mistakes before they ship. Our guide on how to vibe code covers habits that keep the code healthy afterward.
If the product mostly works and needs hardening, a cleanup service is the faster, cheaper route. If you need new features, design and a long-term team as well, look at our list of AI product studios for startups.
If you want a quick, fixed-price verdict on whether to keep or rebuild, Wavect and Metacto have the clearest packaged offers. For a Lovable app whose main worry is Supabase permissions, Red Leg Dev and WZ-IT go deepest on RLS, with WZ-IT adding EU hosting. Larger firms such as *instinctools, Innowise, SoftTeco and Redwerk suit apps that need compliance review, team training or many specialists at once, while Pragmatic Coders and Chudovo offer free first assessments and short timelines.
Whichever you pick, ask every firm for the same three things: a written audit, a clear fix-or-rebuild recommendation with costs, and a defined handover. That makes quotes comparable and keeps you in control of your own code.