Compare the best Cursor alternatives for 2027, from GitHub Copilot and Claude Code to Devin Desktop, Codex, Zed and Kiro, with verified pricing and plans.
Cursor, the AI code editor built by Anysphere, is still one of the most capable tools a developer can install. Its tab completion is fast, its agent can work across a whole repository, and Premium and higher plans add cloud agents and Bugbot code reviews. But the product people signed up for has changed a lot in a short time. SpaceX agreed to acquire Anysphere in an all-stock deal announced in June 2026, and on October 12, 2026 Cursor moved its plans into The X Subscription, a single bundle that covers Cursor, Grok, Grok Bot and X Premium.
The new lineup on Cursor’s pricing page starts with a Free plan, then Plus at $8 per month, Premium at $30 per month, Super at $100 per month and Ultra at $200 per month. Teams start at $30 or more per user per month, and Enterprise is custom. The page lists monthly prices only. The bigger change is model access: Plus includes Grok models only, and on Premium and above, third-party models such as Claude and GPT “remain available in Cursor at API list price,” billed separately from the usage pool. Usage now refreshes weekly. The old $20 Pro plan is no longer offered to new buyers, and Cursor says existing subscribers keep their included third-party usage until they switch.
For developers who mostly code with Claude or GPT models, that means paying a subscription and then paying again per token. Others want a tool that fits a JetBrains, terminal or enterprise workflow better. The ten options below are the tools buyers actually shortlist when they leave Cursor, with prices checked against each vendor’s own pages in October 2026. If you are weighing Cursor against app builders rather than editors, our Cursor vs Lovable comparison covers that decision separately.
Cursor Alternatives At A Glance
Tool
Starting Price
Best For
Standout Feature
GitHub Copilot
Free; Pro $10/mo
Teams already on GitHub
Works in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Xcode, Neovim and more
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Free; Pro $20/mo
Developers who want a Cursor-style IDE
Local agent plus Devin Cloud agents on Pro
Claude Code
Pro $20/mo ($17/mo billed annually)
Terminal-first and multi-surface agent work
Same agent across CLI, IDEs, desktop app and web
OpenAI Codex
Free; Plus $20/mo
ChatGPT subscribers
Codex included in ChatGPT plans from Free upward
Google Antigravity
Free; Google AI Pro $19.99/mo
Gemini users and former Gemini Code Assist users
Agent-first IDE with an agent manager
Zed
Free; Pro $10/mo
Speed and bring-your-own-agent setups
Rust editor that runs external agents via ACP
JetBrains Junie
Free to start; AI Pro $8.33/mo billed annually
IntelliJ, PyCharm and WebStorm users
Built on the IntelliJ engine, BYOK at zero markup
Kiro
Free; Pro $20/mo
Spec-driven development, AWS shops
Turns prompts into requirements, designs and tasks
Cline
Free (pay for model usage)
Developers who want full cost control
Open source with your own API keys
Augment Code
Standard $20/mo
Large codebases and small teams
Context Engine with flat, non-per-seat pricing
Best Cursor Alternatives For 2027
1. GitHub Copilot — The Same AI In Nearly Every Editor You Already Use
GitHub Copilot is the default shortlist entry for anyone leaving Cursor, mainly because it does not ask you to switch editors. GitHub lists support for VS Code, Visual Studio, Xcode, JetBrains IDEs, Neovim, Eclipse, Raycast, SQL Server Management Studio and Zed. Every plan includes agent mode and the CLI, and paid plans add Copilot in the cloud, where you assign work and Copilot opens a pull request.
Pricing is monthly: Free ($0, with 2,000 inline suggestions a month and limited chat and agent usage), Pro at $10 per month, Pro+ at $39 per month and Max at $100 per month. Usage is measured in GitHub AI Credits. Pro includes 1,000 base credits plus 500 flex credits, Pro+ includes 3,900 plus 3,100, and Max includes 10,000 plus 10,000. For organizations, Copilot Business is $19 per seat per month with 1,900 credits per user and Copilot Enterprise is $39 per seat per month with 3,900 credits, pooled across the organization, with overage at $0.01 per credit.
Where it beats Cursor: price at the entry level, unlimited inline suggestions on every paid plan, and tight integration with GitHub issues, pull requests and code review. Pro+ and Max can also delegate tasks to third-party agents such as Claude and OpenAI Codex (in preview), so multi-model access is part of the subscription. Where it falls short: Copilot is an extension living inside someone else’s editor, so the editing experience is less integrated than Cursor’s purpose-built IDE, and heavy agent users can work through credits quickly.
Best for: teams that already host code on GitHub, mixed-editor organizations, and individuals who want the cheapest credible paid plan.
Devin Desktop is the new name for Windsurf, Cognition’s AI editor. Cognition rebranded it in June 2026, and windsurf.com now redirects to devin.ai, and Cognition’s documentation describes Devin Desktop as “a next-generation AI IDE built to keep you in the flow,” with installers still carrying the old windsurf package name during the transition. The primary local agent is Devin Local, an agent harness shared with Devin CLI, and the editor imports VS Code or Cursor settings and keybindings, which makes the move from Cursor fairly painless.
Plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free at $0 with a light quota for coding with agents, Pro at $20 per month with increased quotas and access to Devin Cloud agents (extra usage at API pricing), Max at $200 per month with significantly higher quotas, and Teams at an $80 monthly team fee plus $40 per month for each full developer seat. Enterprise is custom. No annual prices are published.
Where it beats Cursor: it is the most direct replacement in shape, a full AI IDE with a local agent, plus a cloud agent that keeps working when your laptop is closed. The $20 Pro plan also lands where Cursor’s old Pro price used to be. Where it falls short: the June 2026 rebrand and the later split between the Desktop editor and Devin Cloud mean documentation and third-party guides lag behind. Cognition publishes quotas as “light,” “increased” and “significantly higher” rather than numbers, which makes cost planning harder than with Cursor’s multipliers.
Best for: Cursor users who want to keep an IDE-first workflow and like the idea of handing longer tasks to a cloud agent.
3. Claude Code — One Agent Across Terminal, IDE, Desktop App And Web
Claude Code is Anthropic’s agentic coding tool. Instead of being an editor, it reads your codebase, edits files, runs commands and works with git from wherever you start it: the terminal CLI, a VS Code extension (which also installs in Cursor), a JetBrains plugin, a desktop app or the browser at claude.ai/code. All surfaces share the same engine, so project instructions in a CLAUDE.md file, settings and MCP server connections carry across. It also supports subagents, hooks, skills, scheduled tasks and GitHub Actions for CI work.
Claude Code is included in paid Claude plans, not the free tier. Pro is $20 per month billed monthly or $17 per month billed annually ($200 up front). Max is $100 per month and Ultra is $200 per month, both billed monthly. Team Standard seats are $25 per month (or $20 billed annually), Team Premium seats are $125 per month (or $100 billed annually), and Enterprise is $20 per seat per month billed annually with a 20-seat minimum, plus usage at API rates. You can also run it with an Anthropic Console API key and pay per token.
Where it beats Cursor: Claude models are included in the subscription rather than billed at API list price on top, and the same tool runs in a terminal, in CI or in a cloud session. Where it falls short: it is built around Anthropic’s Claude models, so it is not the tool for switching between model vendors, and it is an agent rather than an editor, so developers who lean on Cursor’s tab completion will want to pair it with one. Our Claude Code vs Cursor breakdown goes deeper on the workflow differences.
Best for: developers comfortable in the terminal, people who run long multi-step tasks, and teams that want to script agents into CI.
4. OpenAI Codex — Coding Agent Bundled Into Every ChatGPT Plan
Codex is OpenAI’s coding agent, available on the web, as a CLI, as an IDE extension, in a desktop app and on iOS. If you already pay for ChatGPT, you already have it, which is the main reason it shows up on so many Cursor exit lists. Codex on paid plans runs GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, according to OpenAI’s Codex pricing documentation.
Plans: Free ($0) and Go ($8 per month) cover light tasks with GPT-6 Luna in the desktop app. Plus at $20 per month unlocks Codex across web, CLI, IDE and iOS, with OpenAI estimating 350 to 3,000 local GPT-6 Luna messages or 15 to 160 GPT-6.1 Sol messages per five hours. Pro comes in $100, $200 and $500 monthly tiers, with OpenAI stating Pro currently has no five-hour limit and the $500 tier adding an Ultrafast mode. Business is $25 per user per month, or $20 billed annually for two or more users. There is also an API key option billed at API rates, without cloud features.
Where it beats Cursor: GPT models are included rather than billed at API list price, and the high-end Pro tiers are generous. Where it falls short: usage limits on Plus are expressed as wide ranges per five-hour window, so heavy days can hit a wall, and Codex is not a full editor, so you still need VS Code, a JetBrains IDE or another host for day-to-day editing.
Best for: existing ChatGPT subscribers and teams standardizing on OpenAI models.
5. Google Antigravity — Google’s Agent-First IDE With A Free Individual Tier
Antigravity is Google’s agentic development platform: a full IDE with an agent manager, plus a CLI and IDE extensions. It is now where Google points individual developers. Gemini Code Assist for individuals, Google AI Pro and Google AI Ultra stopped serving requests in the Code Assist IDE extensions and Gemini CLI on June 18, 2026, and Google directs those users to Antigravity. Gemini Code Assist Standard and Enterprise follow a separate schedule.
Pricing: the Individuals tier is $0 with several agent models, unlimited Tab completions, unlimited Command requests and basic weekly rate limits. Higher limits and a flexible AI credit pool come with Google AI Pro, which Google lists at $19.99 per month in the US, and Google AI Ultra, which starts at $99.99 per month with a $199.99 tier. Businesses buy through Google Cloud, where Standard and Plus plans start at $30 per seat per month, or use pay-as-you-go with no seat fee.
Where it beats Cursor: a genuinely usable free tier, Gemini models included in the subscription, and a subscription that also covers Google’s consumer AI apps. Where it falls short: Google does not publish numeric quotas on the pricing page, only “basic,” “higher” and “even more” rate limits, and Google has already retired one coding product this year, which gives some buyers pause.
Best for: Gemini users, Google Cloud customers and anyone who wants a capable agentic IDE before spending money.
6. Zed — A Native Rust Editor That Runs Claude, Codex And Other Agents Via ACP
Zed is a code editor written from scratch in Rust to use multiple CPU cores and the GPU, available for macOS, Linux and Windows. It supports agentic editing natively, runs parallel agent threads across projects, and lets you bring external agents such as Claude Agent, Codex or OpenCode through the Agent Client Protocol (ACP). Edit predictions come from Zeta2, which Zed describes as an open-weight model, and the source is public on GitHub.
Plans: Personal is free forever, with unlimited use when you bring your own API keys or external agents. Pro is $10 per month with unlimited edit predictions and $5 of hosted tokens included, then usage-based billing at API list price plus 10%. Business is $30 per seat per month with no bundled credit allotment. Pro comes with a 14-day trial that includes $5 of usage and needs no credit card.
Where it beats Cursor: speed and responsiveness on large files, real collaboration features (shared projects, chat and screen sharing), and freedom to plug in whichever agent you already pay for. Where it falls short: Zed is not a VS Code fork, so your VS Code extensions do not come with you, and its extension ecosystem is smaller. Hosted AI on Pro is also metered beyond the first $5.
Best for: developers who care about editor performance and want to pair a fast editor with an agent subscription they already have.
7. JetBrains Junie — An Agent Built On The IntelliJ Engine For JetBrains IDE Users
Junie is JetBrains’ coding agent. It runs on the IntelliJ IDEA engine inside JetBrains IDEs, works across multiple projects using the IDE’s code intelligence, and also installs as a CLI on Mac, Linux and Windows. JetBrains says it “works with any model you choose” and supports more than ten models through bring-your-own-key. It sits alongside the wider JetBrains AI subscription, which also covers AI Assistant chat and completion.
Pricing on the Junie page: Free to Start includes Junie Lite, a free model, plus BYOK at provider rates with zero markup. AI Pro is $8.33 per user per month with 10 AI Credits every 30 days, and AI Ultimate is $25 per user per month with 35 credits, which JetBrains marks as recommended for Junie. Those are the annual-billing rates; JetBrains’ FAQ lists individual AI Ultimate at $30 per month on monthly billing. Each credit is worth $1. AI Free is also available to anyone with an active JetBrains IDE license, with unlimited completion and a limited cloud quota.
Where it beats Cursor: if you work in IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm or WebStorm, you keep JetBrains’ refactoring, inspections and debugger instead of trading them for a VS Code fork, and BYOK carries no markup. Where it falls short: the included credit allowances are small compared with Cursor’s usage pools, and JetBrains’ own help pages show more than one pricing table, so confirm the figure at checkout.
Best for: Java, Kotlin and Python teams already standardized on JetBrains tools.
8. Kiro — Spec-Driven Agentic IDE Built And Operated By AWS
Kiro is AWS’s agentic coding tool, offered as an IDE, a CLI, a web interface and a mobile app. Its distinguishing idea is spec-driven development: Kiro turns a prompt into requirements, a design and a task list, then implements the tasks, leaving a written record of decisions the team can follow later. The IDE is based on Code OSS, so you can import VS Code settings, themes and compatible extensions. AWS still sells Amazon Q Developer separately (Free, or Pro at $19 per user per month) for teams that want an assistant inside existing IDEs and the AWS console.
Kiro’s plans are credit based and monthly: Free ($0, 50 credits, open-weight models and Claude Sonnet 4.5), Pro at $20 with 1,000 credits, Pro+ at $40 with 2,000 credits, Pro Max at $100 with 5,000 credits and Power at $200 with 10,000 credits. Paid plans include premium models, and add-on credits cost $0.04 each. Kiro notes that executing a spec task typically costs more than one credit.
Where it beats Cursor: structure. Spec mode forces planning before code, which suits regulated teams and larger features where Cursor’s chat-first agent can drift. Published credit counts are also easier to budget than a weekly pool. Where it falls short: the spec workflow adds overhead for small fixes, and credits drain faster on complex tasks than the headline numbers suggest.
Best for: AWS-centric teams and engineering leads who want documented plans behind AI-written code.
9. Cline — Free Open Source Agent Where You Pay Only For The Model
Cline is an open source coding agent that runs as a VS Code extension and as a CLI. It plans and executes multi-file changes, runs terminal commands and asks for approval along the way. Because it works with your own API keys or the Cline provider, you choose the model for each task, from frontier models to cheaper open-weight ones.
Pricing is simple. Cline says the open source extension is “completely free for individual developers,” with no subscription or seat fee, and model inference is billed by usage through your provider or the Cline provider. Enterprise is custom priced and adds SSO, an SLA, centralized billing and role-based access control. There is no separate Teams plan on the pricing page.
Where it beats Cursor: total cost transparency and no lock-in. You see exactly what each task costs and can switch models without changing tools, which matters now that Cursor bills third-party models at API price on top of a subscription. Where it falls short: there is no flat-rate bundle, so a heavy agent month can cost more than a subscription, and you give up Cursor’s tab completion and polished IDE integration. Cost discipline is on you.
Best for: experienced developers who already hold API keys and want full control over models and spend.
10. Augment Code — Context Engine For Large Codebases With Flat Team Pricing
Augment Code is built around its Context Engine, which indexes a codebase so its agent can work in large, unfamiliar repositories. It runs in VS Code and JetBrains, in the terminal through the Auggie CLI, and through Cosmos, Augment’s platform for automating stages of software delivery such as triage, code review and verification, with human approval points.
Pricing is flat rather than per seat. Standard is $20 per month with $20 of usage included (covering the LLM, Context Engine and compute), up to 50 seats and 50 concurrent sessions. Business is $100 per month with $100 of usage on the same seat and session limits. Enterprise is custom, with unlimited users and sessions, multi-region compute and SSO, OIDC and SCIM support. All plans include the Context Engine, CLI access, the coding agent, Cosmos and MCP tools.
Where it beats Cursor: retrieval across big monorepos is the product’s core focus, and a small team can share one plan instead of paying per seat. Where it falls short: the included usage is modest for a whole team, so real costs depend on top-ups, and Augment is increasingly focused on Cosmos and delivery automation rather than the day-to-day editor experience Cursor users are used to.
Best for: teams working in large or legacy codebases where context is the main bottleneck.
How To Choose A Cursor Alternative
Which Models Do You Actually Use?
This is the question the October 2026 change forces. If Grok models suit you, Cursor’s new plans may be better value than before. If you mostly use Claude, GPT or Gemini, compare the cost of Cursor Premium plus API-priced usage against a tool that includes your preferred model in the subscription: Claude Code for Claude, Codex for GPT, Antigravity for Gemini, or Copilot Pro+ for a mix. If you switch models often, an open tool like Cline or Zed avoids paying twice.
Do You Want An Editor Or An Agent?
Cursor bundles both. Devin Desktop, Antigravity, Kiro and Zed replace the editor itself. Claude Code, Codex, Cline and Augment are agents that plug into an editor you already have. Copilot and Junie sit in between, deeply integrated into existing IDEs. Decide which half of Cursor you would actually miss.
How Predictable Does Your Bill Need To Be?
Some vendors publish hard numbers (Kiro’s credits, Copilot’s AI Credits, JetBrains’ dollar-value credits). Others describe quotas in words or in rolling five-hour and weekly windows. BYOK tools give the most transparency per task but no ceiling unless you set one.
Which IDE Is Your Team Standardized On?
Cursor and most of its direct rivals are VS Code forks. If your team lives in JetBrains IDEs, Junie, Copilot, Augment and the Claude Code plugin all keep you there. If you use Xcode, Visual Studio or Neovim, Copilot has the widest editor coverage of anything here.
What Do Admin, Security And Procurement Require?
Check SSO, SCIM, audit logs and data handling before you trial anything at team scale. Copilot Business and Enterprise, Claude Enterprise, Antigravity through Google Cloud, Augment Enterprise and Cline Enterprise all cover the basics. Teams on AWS will find Kiro and Amazon Q Developer easier to approve, and Google Cloud customers will find the same with Antigravity.
Are You Really Looking For An App Builder?
Some people who try Cursor are not developers and mainly want to describe an app and get a working product. In that case a browser-based builder may suit you better than any editor on this list. Our Replit vs Lovable comparison is a good starting point for that route.
Conclusion
Cursor is still a strong product, and for developers happy with Grok models its new plans can work out well. The reasons people are shopping around are concrete: third-party models moved to API list pricing on the new plans, the cheapest paid tier is Grok-only, and the product is now sold as part of a wider X bundle. None of that makes Cursor a bad editor, but it does change the math for anyone whose daily work runs on Claude, GPT or Gemini.
For the smoothest switch, GitHub Copilot and Devin Desktop are the closest fits: Copilot if you want to stay in your current editor at a lower price, Devin Desktop if you want another full AI IDE with cloud agents. Claude Code, Codex and Antigravity make sense when you want a specific model family included in your subscription. Zed and Cline suit developers who want to control models and costs directly, while Junie, Kiro and Augment serve JetBrains shops, spec-driven teams and large codebases respectively.
Most of these tools have a free tier or trial, so the practical approach is to run two or three of them on the same real task from your backlog for a week, track what you spend, and keep the one that fits how you actually work.
