Quick answer: A typical senior search takes about three to four months from kickoff to an accepted offer, but the range by role is wide. Vice president searches often land in that window, other C-suite roles commonly run five to six months, and CEO searches can take anywhere from three to nine months or more. Then add the notice period, which can be a few weeks in some markets and up to a year for senior people in others. For many C-suite hires, the realistic gap between a vacancy and a first day is six months or longer.
Our guide to the executive search process, step by step breaks a standard search into stages and gives a week-by-week timeline. This guide looks at the question from a different angle: how timelines vary by role, what stretches each kind of search, and how long it really takes before the new leader starts.
The ranges below are planning ranges drawn from published sources and the experience reported by search firms. They run to an accepted offer and exclude notice periods unless stated. Treat them as a starting point for your own planning, not a promise.
| Role | Planning Range To Accepted Offer | What Usually Drives It | Basis |
| CEO | Three to nine months, sometimes longer | Board alignment, internal candidates, very small target pool | Korn Ferry observations |
| Other C-suite (CFO, COO, CTO, CMO) | Around five to six months | Board involvement, assessment depth, competing offers | JRG Partners benchmark |
| Senior VP and VP | Around three to four months | Market size, compensation fit, decision speed | ReVerb process guide |
| VP of Sales at a growth company | Six months to a year or more for the best results | Scarcity of proven leaders at the right stage | SaaStr interview |
| Non-executive director (UK) | About 10 to 16 weeks | Board calendar, skills matrix, conflicts checks | FD Capital |
| Fund board director (US) | About 12 to 18 months | Board process and regulatory considerations | Mutual Fund Directors Forum |
| Nonexecutive roles, for comparison | Median of 39 days to fill | Active candidate pools | SHRM |
CEO searches are the hardest to predict because so much depends on the board. Korn Ferry, writing that CEO hires are taking longer too, describes a typical three- to nine-month hiring cycle that experts have seen stretch out, while noting that figures on C-suite hires are hard to come by. A search committee has to agree the profile, weigh internal candidates fairly and keep the full board aligned, and each of those steps can add weeks.
Internal candidates matter more than many boards expect. The Conference Board’s analysis of CEO succession practices found that 77% of new S&P 500 CEOs in 2024 were promoted from within. Where a board runs a full external search alongside internal candidates, the assessment and comparison stage takes longer. Boards that have done their board-level search and succession work in advance move faster when the moment comes.
JRG Partners, in its piece on setting realistic expectations for the board, puts a comprehensive US executive search at 20 to 24 weeks, or five to six months, and says board indecision extends searches by an average of four to six weeks. CFO, COO and other C-suite searches tend to involve the board or audit committee, deeper referencing and more complex packages, all of which add time compared with a vice president search.
Revenue leaders are a special case at growth companies. In a SaaStr session on hiring your first VP of Sales, investor Brendon Cassidy advises founders to run the search “over six months, a year, sometimes more than that,” and warns that “no hire is better than the wrong hire.” The pool of people who have scaled sales at the right stage is small, and the best of them are rarely looking.
CTO, CIO and CISO searches often run into tight markets and strong counteroffers, especially where candidates hold unvested equity. If you are hiring in this area, a firm with a dedicated technology practice will usually have a shorter path to the right people; our list of IT and technology executive search firms is a good place to start.
Non-executive searches can be quick or very slow depending on the board. FD Capital’s guide to NED recruitment in the UK says a well-run search takes 10 to 16 weeks from brief to appointment. At the other end, the Mutual Fund Directors Forum reports that search firms told it fund board searches typically take approximately 12 to 18 months. The difference reflects how often the board meets, how many people must agree and how many conflicts each candidate has to clear.
These are the most predictable searches. Candidate pools are larger, fewer people need to approve the hire and packages are simpler. The stage-by-stage timeline in our process guide, roughly 90 to 120 days to an accepted offer, fits most of these searches well.
An accepted offer is not a start date. Senior leaders usually have to resign, serve notice and leave their current role in good order, and this is where many hiring plans fall apart.
In the UK, DavidsonMorris notes in its guide to garden leave that for many senior employees, notice periods can be as much as 12 months, although courts typically allow no more than six months of garden leave. In the US, notice is often shorter, but start dates are still shaped by bonus timing, unvested equity and the candidate’s wish to leave their current employer on good terms. Our process guide suggests planning for one to three months of notice after acceptance as a baseline.
Here is how a CFO search might play out at a mid-sized US company, using the ranges above. The weeks are illustrative.
| Stage | Indicative Timing | Notes |
| Decision to hire and firm selection | Weeks 1 to 3 | Approve budget, choose a firm, sign terms |
| Search to accepted offer | Weeks 4 to 25 | Around five to six months, per the JRG Partners benchmark |
| Notice and transition | Weeks 26 to 38 | About three months, longer if the candidate is in the UK |
| First day | Around month 9 | Onboarding begins |
The lesson is simple: if you know a senior role will open in nine months, the search should probably start now.
Our process guide covers the client behaviors that slow searches down. The levers below are about planning, and most of them happen before the search starts.
Some long searches are simply hard. Others are long because something is wrong. Be concerned if the firm cannot present a credible shortlist after two months, if candidates keep dropping out at the same stage, or if the profile has changed more than once. These usually point to a brief that does not match the market, a package that is below what the role needs, or a decision group that has not agreed what it wants. Resetting the brief is often faster than pushing on.
Long searches create pressure from the board, the team waiting for a leader and sometimes investors. Agree at the start what you will share and when. A short written update every two weeks, covering progress against the plan, the quality of the market response and any decisions needed, keeps confidence high and stops rumors filling the gap.
Be honest about the calendar from day one. Telling a team their new leader will arrive “next quarter” when the realistic date is nine months away damages trust when the date slips. Share the planning range, explain the notice period risk and confirm the start date only once the candidate has resigned. Where an interim leader is in place, make their mandate clear so the team knows which decisions can be made now and which will wait for the permanent hire.
Executive search timelines depend heavily on the role. Vice president searches commonly take three to four months, other C-suite roles around five to six, and CEO and some board searches longer still. Add one to three months of notice as a baseline, and up to a year for some senior candidates in markets such as the UK. The fastest searches are the ones planned before the vacancy opens.
For firms by function, sector and city, and our guides to the search process, fees and assessment, visit the executive search and recruiting hub.