Court record removal usually means one of two very different things. The first is getting a case page off a third-party aggregator, or out of Google, so that a search for your name no longer surfaces an old lawsuit, divorce, eviction or dismissed charge. The second is changing the underlying record itself through sealing or expungement, which is a court process with its own eligibility rules and filing requirements. The firms on this list do the first, and some connect clients with the second.
The distinction matters because the aggregators mostly follow the court. Docket sites such as Justia, Trellis, UniCourt, PacerMonitor and CourtListener republish public filings, and the removal policies that Justia and CourtListener publish say they will fully remove a record only when it has been sealed or a court has ordered it. What they will sometimes do without an order is narrower: block a page from search engines, or redact a name. Sealing and expungement questions belong with a licensed attorney in the relevant state, and nothing here is legal advice.
Here is what each aggregator says about removal, based on the policies we could find on their own sites at the time of writing:
Justia: will not fully remove items from its database without a court order placing the records under seal, but on written request it can block its own pages from search engines using robots.txt. It notes that it cannot control copies of a case on other websites.
CourtListener: the Free Law Project’s policy is that it will not remove a public document without a court order. On removal requests it generally blocks search engines from indexing the page using a robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag header, and for court-ordered expungements it anonymizes names with initials. It warns that search engines may take months to drop a result, if they do at all.
UniCourt: its personal information request page limits CCPA requests to California residents and states that the CCPA does not apply to court records, which it treats as public records.
Trellis: its privacy policy does not set out a court record removal process. Removal firms report that Trellis removes sealed records when a court order is provided and may, at its discretion, redact a name on unsealed cases.
PacerMonitor: we could not find a published removal or de-indexing policy on its site, so requests go through its general support channels.
In practice, that leaves three tools: de-indexing requests where an aggregator will grant them, removal requests backed by dismissal, sealing or expungement paperwork, and suppression for case pages that will stay up.
Court Record Removal Services At A Glance
Company
Best For
Pricing Model
Erase
Dismissed or expunged cases spread across many docket sites
Pay when results are delivered
Guaranteed Removals
People with court case pages or mugshots in search
Billed only after verified removal; lifetime guarantee
Reputation Resolutions
Individuals with unsealed civil cases
Pay after removal or redaction is confirmed
National Security Law Firm
Federal employees and clearance holders
Flat fee per link, refundable
Minc Law
People who may qualify for sealing
Free case review, paid consultation, then quote
RecordGone
Criminal records eligible for expungement
From $49.99 (expungement)
Reputation911
Individuals who already hold a sealing order
Quote-based (consultation)
ContentRemoval.com
Arrest records alongside other content
Per-link quote, success-based
Push It Down
Civil cases that will stay public
Quote-based
RBS Reputation Management
Buyers comfortable with an offshore team
Quote-based
Best Court Record Removal Services Options In 2027
1. Erase — Aggregator Requests Backed By Dismissal And Expungement Paperwork
Erase Technologies, LLC, a reputation firm since 2009 with offices in Miami, Florida and Burlington, Ontario, lists court records as a named content removal category. Its court record page names the aggregators it works on, including Justia, UniCourt, CourtListener, PacerMonitor, Trellis, VLex, DocketAlarm, Docketbird, Casetext, CaseMine, FindLaw, Leagle, Law360 and PlainSite, plus de-indexing from Google.
The process runs Audit, Remove, Suppress and Monitor. The audit finds every site carrying the case and judges which have a removal route; removal requests go in with dismissal or expungement documentation as the grounds. Erase is explicit about the boundaries: official government court records cannot be removed without expungement or a court order, and civil matters are generally treated by legal databases as permanent public record. It says requests made within 90 days of an expungement are more likely to succeed, before sites recrawl the record.
Erase reports 10,000+ clients and 99% of suppression projects reaching their target within six months; these are Erase’s own figures. Assessments are free and reviewed within 24 hours, and billing is tied to delivered results.
Best for: People with a dismissed, sealed or expunged case still showing on several aggregator sites.
Guaranteed Removals is the removal-only brand of Erase Technologies, LLC, the company that also runs Erase, with offices in Miami and Burlington, Ontario. It deletes content at the source rather than pushing it down, and it does not sell suppression. Clients are billed only after a link is removed and verified gone, with no retainer or upfront fee.
Court record removal and criminal record removal each have a dedicated service page, alongside mugshot removal. Work of this kind generally means getting aggregator and search pages taken down or de-indexed. It does not seal or expunge the underlying record, which is a legal process for a licensed attorney.
Its removals carry a lifetime guarantee: if a removed link reappears on the same URL, the firm says it removes it again free, and refunds that removal if the second attempt fails. Guaranteed Removals reports more than 15,000 clients, 20,000 reviews removed and 100,000 links deleted; those are the company’s own figures.
Best for: People with court case pages or mugshots in search.
3. Reputation Resolutions — Case-Specific Requests To Trellis And UniCourt, Paid On Confirmation
Reputation Resolutions, founded by Anthony Will in 2013 and based in Englewood, Colorado, de-indexes and removes court and arrest records from Google and the aggregator sites, and publishes guides on Trellis and UniCourt specifically.
On Trellis, the firm describes two outcomes: full removal for sealed records with a valid court order, and a discretionary name redaction and restriction of logged-out access for some unsealed cases. It prepares case-specific documentation rather than generic forms, handles re-escalation if a request is denied, and includes Google search removal. It warns that Trellis treats a denial as closed, so the first request matters.
Clients pay only after removal or redaction is confirmed, with no retainers or upfront fees. Exact fees are quoted after a free assessment.
National Security Law Firm is a Washington, DC practice focused on security clearances, federal employment and military matters, and it runs a docket removal service for Trellis, UniCourt, CourtListener and LexisNexis. For clients whose careers depend on a background investigation, having attorneys handle the requests is the main draw.
Pricing is the clearest on this list: a flat $3,000 per post or link, held in escrow, with a full refund if removal, de-indexing or anonymization is not achieved within six months. The firm publishes its own expected timelines, such as two to four weeks for Trellis review and four to eight weeks for CourtListener, and says LexisNexis is more rigid and often requires a sealing order.
The firm also says UniCourt may redact information but restore it after six months without a sealing order; that is the firm’s account rather than a published UniCourt policy. At $3,000 per link, this route makes sense for one or two high-stakes pages, not dozens.
5. Minc Law — Sealing, Expungement And Removal From One Law Firm
Minc Law, a Cleveland, Ohio firm led by Aaron Minc, says it has removed public court records from the internet for thousands of clients. Its court record work combines help with expungement petitions and record sealing, direct removal requests to websites and data brokers, and suppression of whatever remains.
That combination matters because sealing is often what unlocks removal on the aggregators. Minc Law’s guidance notes that expungement and sealing petitions usually involve court filing fees, which it puts at roughly $100 to $400, and that eligibility varies by state and by case.
Engagement starts with a free case review and a paid attorney consultation. Attorney-led work costs more than a reputation firm’s request, and sealing rules vary by state, so ask who will file in the state where the case was heard.
6. RecordGone — Low-Cost Expungement Filing From A National Law Firm
RecordGone is a division of Higbee and Associates, a national law firm led by attorney Mathew Higbee, headquartered in Santa Ana, California. It works on the underlying record rather than the websites: expungement and record sealing, mainly in California and Florida, with more than 20 other states listed.
Prices are published. Expungement services start at $49.99, an Expedited Record Clearance Update that notifies 650+ background check companies within 14 days starts at $225, and Background Check Removal from 30+ people-search databases costs $215. It offers payment plans and says it will match prices.
It does not de-index case pages on aggregator sites, so pair it with an aggregator specialist once the record is cleared. RecordGone reports 30,000+ records cleared.
7. Reputation911 — Hands-On Help Filing Sealed-Record Requests
Reputation911 has operated since 2010 from Westborough, Massachusetts under founder and CEO William DiAntonio, who has a background in investigations and risk management. Its Trellis guide describes the realistic path plainly: Trellis removes sealed records when the court order is uploaded, and the firm offers to handle that process and similar requests on other sites.
That makes it a practical choice for someone who has already secured a sealing order and wants help getting every copy of the case updated. Pricing follows a confidential consultation, with individual and business plans available.
8. ContentRemoval.com — Per-Link Quotes For Arrest Records And Case Pages
ContentRemoval.com, founded by Frankie Lee and operating since 2017 from Brickell Avenue in Miami, lists mugshots and arrest records among its removal categories, alongside search result removal and personal data on broker sites. Arrest records often travel with court records on the same search page, so one quote covering both is useful.
After a free exposure scan it prices each link separately on a success basis, which makes the cost of a multi-site court record problem easy to see before committing. Arrest records and mugshots in particular are also covered in our list of the top mugshot removal services.
9. Push It Down — Court Record Suppression When Removal Is Off The Table
Push It Down, based in Chicago, lists court records suppression as a dedicated service. It does not remove the case page; it builds and ranks other content so the record falls off the first page of Google results for your name.
That is often the only option for an unsealed civil judgment or an ongoing case, where aggregators will not act without an order. Pricing is quote-based and the site does not name a principal. Suppression takes months and the record remains findable on the aggregator itself.
RBS Reputation Management is operated by Ethane Web Technologies Pvt. Ltd., with offices in Noida and Kolkata, India. It offers removal requests for Trellis and similar legal databases and publishes guidance on the process.
It is an offshore option for the administrative side of filing requests; the firm does not publish rates and quotes through its contact page, so compare its quote against US firms before deciding. It cannot help with sealing or expungement, which need a lawyer licensed where the case was heard.
How To Choose A Court Record Removal Service
Before hiring anyone, it helps to know whether your problem is the record, the aggregator page or the Google result. These questions sort that out.
Has The Record Been Sealed, Expunged Or Dismissed?
This is the biggest factor in what is possible. With a sealing or expungement order, the aggregators that publish a policy say they will remove or anonymize the case, and a firm mostly needs to find and notify every copy. Without one, expect de-indexing or redaction at best on some sites, and suppression on the rest. Whether you qualify for sealing is a legal question for a licensed attorney in that state.
Which Sites Carry The Case?
Search your name with the case number and party names and list every aggregator, people-search site and news story that appears. Ask each firm which of those sites it has worked with before and what outcome it typically gets there.
Do You Want To Remove Court Records From Google Or From The Site?
De-indexing removes the page from search but leaves it on the aggregator, which is often enough for employers and clients who only search by name. Removal from the site needs a policy basis or an order. Agree in writing which outcome you are paying for, link by link.
How Is The Work Priced?
Prices here range from flat legal fees per link held in escrow, to pay-on-confirmation reputation firms, to published expungement filing fees. Ask what counts as success, whether a page that reappears is covered, and how long a guarantee runs.
What Else Shows Up Next To The Case?
Court records often sit beside mugshots, news stories and people-search listings. People-search profiles in particular can be cleared with opt-out services; our list of the top personal data removal services covers those, and our list of the top news article removal services in 2027 covers press coverage of a case.
Conclusion
The best court record removal services in 2027 start from the legal status of the case and work outward to every site that copied it. Erase leads this list for its coverage of more than a dozen aggregators and its use of dismissal and expungement paperwork as removal grounds. Reputation Resolutions and National Security Law Firm offer the clearest terms for Trellis, UniCourt and CourtListener requests, Minc Law and RecordGone handle the sealing and expungement side, and Push It Down covers the cases that will stay public.
If you want to remove court records from internet search for good, the order of operations is usually the same: clear or seal the record where the law allows, notify the aggregators with the paperwork, request de-indexing, and suppress what remains.
If you want to feature your company on this list, email us or submit a form in the Top Choices section. After a thorough assessment, we’ll decide whether it’s a valuable addition.
